Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Jan 25, Jaka Kranjc [lynx AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> On Thursday 25 January 2007 17:05, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > A new one: While I was doing the above upgrades, I found that on my test
> > system at least, doing just 'sorcery queue; cast --queue' ends up with a
> > glibc failure due to errors about symbol definition loops.  But it appears
> > to only happen if glibc casts before gcc.  If I do the toolchain (in 
> > order)
> > explicitly before the rest of the system, no errors (so far; it's still
> > going, but glibc didn't fail this time for sure).
> >
> > So, this probably isn't gating, but it may mean people will have a glibc
> > error using the default upgrade path if they don't have a practice of
> > watching for toolchain updates and managing them separately.  They can 
> > just
> > 'cast --queue' again and it should get through the second time, but that
> > could be a disturbing error for people, and a waste of compile time.  Do 
> > we
> > want to do anything about this?
> Can't we just add a depends gcc to glibc? Or maybe a force_depends?

The depends appears to have worked.

I don't see anything else preventing us releasing any time now.

Attachment: pgpGOM770yRJi.pgp
Description: PGP signature