Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] stable grimoire release

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Andrew <afrayedknot AT t.armory.com>
  • To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable grimoire release
  • Date: Fri, 26 Jan 2007 11:31:11 -0600

On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:27:20AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Jan 26, Juuso Alasuutari [iuso AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > On Friday 26 January 2007 06:16, Andrew Stitt wrote:
> > > On Thu, Jan 25, 2007 at 04:58:54PM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > > On Jan 25, Jaka Kranjc [lynx AT mages.ath.cx] wrote:
> > > > > On Thursday 25 January 2007 17:05, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The depends appears to have worked.
> > > >
> > > > I don't see anything else preventing us releasing any time now.
> > >
> > > Everything on the wiki is signed off except for smgl-fhs (sandalle),
> > > shadow (sandalle), and udev (iuso). I dont think there are any gating
> > > issues left unresolved with those spells. So I think we're ready to
> > > release.
> > >
> > > I propose formally releasing it tomorrow (January 26th) around noon PST.
> > > Thats 16 hours from now. Now is the time to bring up any last minute
> > > issues. Otherwise they will be delayed until the next release.
> > >
> > > Great job everyone. Time to start brainstorming ideas to streamline
> > > things for the next cycle. Would anyone like to take the wheel and drive
> > > the next one? I think multiple leads should have practice doing it.
> >
> > There's one thing about udev still. The version in stable-rc is 103,
> > which
> > deprecates hotplug, but it's still missing the necessary edits I've been
> > working on (while also busy with work :/). If we choose to postpone the
> > hotplug->udev transition for this release, we should downgrade
> > stable-rc's
> > udev to the one in the present stable to be sure.
> >
> > Another option would be to integrate the edits I've made in test (udev
> > 104,
> > hotplug, linux), they work well for me. But we'd still need to try them
> > out
> > on other boxes than only mine.
> >
> > I think postponing the transition (using the udev from current stable)
> > would
> > be nice because then more users would have a recent enough kernel when
> > the
> > new udev is finally integrated.
>
> Yes, this needs more testing before it goes forward. Which commit ids need
> reverting?

I agree, lets roll it back and release 0.6.

-Andrew




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page