Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT t.armory.com>]

On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:01:23AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> On Jan 26, Andrew [afrayedknot AT t.armory.com] wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:27:20AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > On Jan 26, Juuso Alasuutari [iuso AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > > > There's one thing about udev still. The version in stable-rc is 103,
> > > > which deprecates hotplug, but it's still missing the necessary edits
> > > > I've been working on (while also busy with work :/). If we choose to
> > > > postpone the hotplug->udev transition for this release, we should
> > > > downgrade stable-rc's udev to the one in the present stable to be
> > > > sure.
> > > > 
> > > > Another option would be to integrate the edits I've made in test
> > > > (udev 104, hotplug, linux), they work well for me. But we'd still
> > > > need to try them out on other boxes than only mine.
> > > > 
> > > > I think postponing the transition (using the udev from current
> > > > stable) would be nice because then more users would have a recent
> > > > enough kernel when the new udev is finally integrated.
> > > 
> > > Yes, this needs more testing before it goes forward.  Which commit ids 
> > > need
> > > reverting?
> > 
> > I agree, lets roll it back and release 0.6.
> 
> We rolled this back; theoretically it matches stable-0.4 again but it could
> use some testing so we can release.

Ok. What testing would be sufficient? Do we know of any issues with the
stable-0.4 version?

-Andrew