Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Jeremy Blosser <jblosser-smgl AT firinn.org>]

On Jan 27, Andrew Stitt [afrayedknot AT t.armory.com] wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 27, 2007 at 01:01:23AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > On Jan 26, Andrew [afrayedknot AT t.armory.com] wrote:
> > > On Fri, Jan 26, 2007 at 10:27:20AM -0600, Jeremy Blosser wrote:
> > > > On Jan 26, Juuso Alasuutari [iuso AT sourcemage.org] wrote:
> > > > > There's one thing about udev still. The version in stable-rc is 103,
> > > > > which deprecates hotplug, but it's still missing the necessary edits
> > > > > I've been working on (while also busy with work :/). If we choose to
> > > > > postpone the hotplug->udev transition for this release, we should
> > > > > downgrade stable-rc's udev to the one in the present stable to be
> > > > > sure.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Another option would be to integrate the edits I've made in test
> > > > > (udev 104, hotplug, linux), they work well for me. But we'd still
> > > > > need to try them out on other boxes than only mine.
> > > > > 
> > > > > I think postponing the transition (using the udev from current
> > > > > stable) would be nice because then more users would have a recent
> > > > > enough kernel when the new udev is finally integrated.
> > > > 
> > > > Yes, this needs more testing before it goes forward.  Which commit 
> > > > ids need
> > > > reverting?
> > > 
> > > I agree, lets roll it back and release 0.6.
> > 
> > We rolled this back; theoretically it matches stable-0.4 again but it 
> > could
> > use some testing so we can release.
> 
> Ok. What testing would be sufficient? Do we know of any issues with the
> stable-0.4 version?

Probably what ever smoke testing is normal for udev... I don't use it, I
don't know what's normal to look for.

Attachment: pgpEb_w5n0XvF.pgp
Description: PGP signature