Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Sergey A. Lipnevich" <sergey AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] voting process
  • Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:08:30 -0500

Jeremy Blosser (emrys) wrote:
vote results have to be examined. But we can get rid of 90% of the concern
around casual "political" peer-pressure voting by keeping the initial vote
closed.
Or we can get rid of 100% of concerns by eliminating political peer-pressure and auditing the votes openly. Nobody can maliciously influence a vote when it's happening (while results are being collected), and after it's done, the results become open for audit purposes.

Sergey.




Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page