sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- 2022
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 2023
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
- 2024
- 01
- 02
- 03
- 04
- 05
- 06
- 07
- 08
- 09
- 10
- 11
- 12
2005/08
460 mails
Chronological Thread << < page 12 / 16 > >>
-
05/08/29
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?, Andrew
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, David Kowis
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, David Kowis
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, dave
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?, Seth Alan Woolley
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] STRONGER POLICY for gpg signatures to replace MD5[*] and ALSO new SOURCE_HASH support, Mads Laursen
- [SM-Discuss] Warning: test grimoire init.d breakage, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Warning: test grimoire init.d breakage, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- [SM-Discuss] Compromise on signatures, Sergey A. Lipnevich
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Warning: test grimoire init.d breakage, Andrew
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Warning: test grimoire init.d breakage, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compromise on signatures, Seth Alan Woolley
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Warning: test grimoire init.d breakage, Seth Alan Woolley
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compromise on signatures, Seth Alan Woolley
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compromise on signatures, Jeremy Blosser (emrys)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Compromise on signatures, David Kowis
-
05/08/30
- [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?], Robin Cook
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?], Seth Alan Woolley
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?], Seth Alan Woolley
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.