sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?]
- From: Robin Cook <rcook AT wyrms.net>
- To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?]
- Date: Tue, 30 Aug 2005 06:30:54 -0500
Just need to make sure gcc34 has UPDATED set so that when it's moved into test it gets recast otherwise gcc change to 4.0.1 will cause gcc 3.4.4 to be removed.
CuZnDragon
Robin Cook
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?
Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:12:11 -0400
From: Sergey A. Lipnevich <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
Hi All,
I propose moving both of these into test, with some time interval between. The
reason why OpenSSL 0.9.8 should go into test is because it doesn't break
anything with very few exceptions (I found one and patched, httpd-dev). The GCC
4 has to go because (a) most important stuff is patched or uses gcc34 and (b) we
now have spells in test that depend on gcc34 (e.g. ntp) while that compiler is
available as is already, which doesn't make sense. Also, I didn't check but
spells with dependency on gcc34 may have propagated into stable already, where
the compiler version is 3.3, which makes even less sense.
What are your thoughts on this?
Thanks!
Sergey.
_______________________________________________
SM-Discuss mailing list
SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?],
Robin Cook, 08/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?],
Seth Alan Woolley, 08/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?], Seth Alan Woolley, 08/30/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?], Andrew, 08/30/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] [Fwd: GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?],
Seth Alan Woolley, 08/30/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.