Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>]

On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 08:18:50AM -0700, Seth Alan Woolley wrote:
> But if you don't have anything depending on gcc34, it's ok if it gets 
> removed, as next time that a spell that does need gcc34 is cast, it 
> should have its own dependency on gcc34.
> 
> I'm not sure how sorcery handles it if it's all in one big queue though, 
> but I hope gcc34 doesn't show up before gcc is needed -- perhaps gcc34 
> should depend on gcc to ensure proper ordering instead?

I guess it wouldn't really matter as gcc34 goes into a different 
location and by then it should have the correct grimoire with the 
non-null spell.  So in theory, an extra depends wouldn't be needed, but 
perhaps UPDATED is needed because if gcc34 doesn't show up on the queue, 
gcc34's null spell will never get properly updated to the real spell.  
OK, I talked myself into it :).

Seth

> 
> Seth
> 
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 06:30:54AM -0500, Robin Cook wrote:
> > Just need to make sure gcc34 has UPDATED set so that when it's moved 
> > into test it gets recast otherwise gcc change to 4.0.1 will cause gcc 
> > 3.4.4 to be removed.
> > 
> > CuZnDragon
> > Robin Cook
> > 
> > -------- Original Message --------
> > Subject: [SM-Discuss] GCC 4 and OpenSSL 0.9.8 in test?
> > Date: Mon, 29 Aug 2005 15:12:11 -0400
> > From: Sergey A. Lipnevich <sergey AT optimaltec.com>
> > To: SM-Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
> > 
> > Hi All,
> > 
> > I propose moving both of these into test, with some time interval 
> > between. The
> > reason why OpenSSL 0.9.8 should go into test is because it doesn't break
> > anything with very few exceptions (I found one and patched, httpd-dev). 
> > The GCC
> > 4 has to go because (a) most important stuff is patched or uses gcc34 
> > and (b) we
> > now have spells in test that depend on gcc34 (e.g. ntp) while that 
> > compiler is
> > available as is already, which doesn't make sense. Also, I didn't check 
> > but
> > spells with dependency on gcc34 may have propagated into stable already, 
> > where
> > the compiler version is 3.3, which makes even less sense.
> > What are your thoughts on this?
> > Thanks!
> > 
> > Sergey.
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> > 
> > 
> > _______________________________________________
> > SM-Discuss mailing list
> > SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
> Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
> Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
> Secretary Pacific Green Party of Oregon http://www.pacificgreens.org
> Key id FDCEE733 = 5302 B414 64C4 6112 3454  E082 99F0 69DC FDCE E733



> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss


-- 
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Secretary Pacific Green Party of Oregon http://www.pacificgreens.org
Key id FDCEE733 = 5302 B414 64C4 6112 3454  E082 99F0 69DC FDCE E733

Attachment: pgpgjKR_MBDO7.pgp
Description: PGP signature