Public SourceMage Discussion List

[Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>]

On Mon, Aug 29, 2005 at 03:12:11PM -0400, Sergey A. Lipnevich wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> I propose moving both of these into test, with some time interval between. 
> The
> reason why OpenSSL 0.9.8 should go into test is because it doesn't break
> anything with very few exceptions (I found one and patched, httpd-dev). The 
> GCC
> 4 has to go because (a) most important stuff is patched or uses gcc34 and 

I'm ok with this move, so we can get more testing of gcc4.  Same with openssl.

> (b) we
> now have spells in test that depend on gcc34 (e.g. ntp) while that compiler 
> is
> available as is already, which doesn't make sense. Also, 

gcc34 is a null placeholder spell while we work on 4.0.x, so it's not an 
issue.

> I didn't check but
> spells with dependency on gcc34 may have propagated into stable already, 
> where
> the compiler version is 3.3, which makes even less sense.

stable-0.1 has version 3.4.4 (stable-0.0 had 3.4.3) and gcc34 is still a 
null placeholder spell; this isn't an issue, either.

Seth

> What are your thoughts on this?
> Thanks!
> 
> Sergey.
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
> 

-- 
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Quality Assurance Team Leader & Security Team: Source Mage GNU/linux
Linux so advanced, it may as well be magic http://www.sourcemage.org
Secretary Pacific Green Party of Oregon http://www.pacificgreens.org
Key id FDCEE733 = 5302 B414 64C4 6112 3454  E082 99F0 69DC FDCE E733

Attachment: pgpR0DLfIoLj0.pgp
Description: PGP signature