sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ <cerise AT littlegreenmen.armory.com>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:51:41 -0700 (PDT)
Andrew Stitt said:
> its worth pointing out that if you do that, or decide to switch grimoires
> around, upon a sorcery update it will try to reinstall anything that has
> a different version number (up or down), this includes gcc even, so for
> those spells one has to either edit them out of the install file every
> update, or put them on hold so sorcery update ignores them.
That's about the only proper way to do it that I can think of.
Any other way gives the users problems if the author backtracks.
-Phil/CERisE
-
[SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Spencer Ogden, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Eric Womack, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Andrew Stitt, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, bluebird, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Dufflebunk, 07/27/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.