sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Spencer Ogden <spencero AT mail.utexas.edu>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 22:25:00 -0500
On Thursday 25 July 2002 10:20 pm, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ wrote:
> One possible conundrum to be solved. Let's say I run devel for a
> day and have it update my current setup. Let's then say that I find
> that critical spells (for me) in devel are broken. If I then pull off
> the stable grimoire and run update, will it replace the things in devel
> with the versions in stable?
>
> -Phil/CERisE
The answer is yes, I did this very transition about a month ago,
devel->stable->devel. It takes a lot of compiling of couse, and it may
take more than one update to sort things out, but in the end I ran in to
no major problems. I guess another anwswer is that if you can't live with
some runtime problems every once ina while for a few days, then you
shouldn't be running devel. That was the response always heard about
debian unstable.
Spencer
>
> _______________________________________________
> SM-Discuss mailing list
> SM-Discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/sm-discuss
-
[SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Spencer Ogden, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Eric Womack, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Andrew Stitt, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, bluebird, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.