sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Andrew Stitt <afrayedknot AT thefrayedknot.armory.com>
- To: Eric Womack <eric AT lasvegasdata.com>
- Cc: Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ <cerise AT littlegreenmen.armory.com>, Ari Steinberg <ari.steinberg AT stanford.edu>, sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:31:34 -0700
On Thu, Jul 25, 2002 at 09:12:39PM -0700, Eric Womack wrote:
> > Sensible. I take it that new versions of the same software will
> > propagate in like manner.
> > One possible conundrum to be solved. Let's say I run devel for a
> > day and have it update my current setup. Let's then say that I find
> > that critical spells (for me) in devel are broken. If I then pull off
> > the stable grimoire and run update, will it replace the things in devel
> > with the versions in stable?
> >
> > -Phil/CERisE
>
>
> You can do that without changing grimoire entirely.
>
> Edit the DETAILS file of any given spell to the version you wish, re-cast,
> then hold the spell. It will stay there until you decide to release it.
>
> I have done this on a few packages where I wanted to be further on the
> "bleeding edge" then the section guru was comfortable releasing to the
> grimoire. Works in either direction.
>
> Eric
its worth pointing out that if you do that, or decide to switch grimoires
around, upon a sorcery update it will try to reinstall anything that has
a different version number (up or down), this includes gcc even, so for
those spells one has to either edit them out of the install file every
update, or put them on hold so sorcery update ignores them.
-
[SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Spencer Ogden, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Eric Womack, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Andrew Stitt, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, bluebird, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.