sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Womack <eric AT lasvegasdata.com>
- To: Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ <cerise AT littlegreenmen.armory.com>
- Cc: Ari Steinberg <ari.steinberg AT stanford.edu>, <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches
- Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 21:12:39 -0700
> Sensible. I take it that new versions of the same software will
> propagate in like manner.
> One possible conundrum to be solved. Let's say I run devel for a
> day and have it update my current setup. Let's then say that I find
> that critical spells (for me) in devel are broken. If I then pull off
> the stable grimoire and run update, will it replace the things in devel
> with the versions in stable?
>
> -Phil/CERisE
You can do that without changing grimoire entirely.
Edit the DETAILS file of any given spell to the version you wish, re-cast,
then hold the spell. It will stay there until you decide to release it.
I have done this on a few packages where I wanted to be further on the
"bleeding edge" then the section guru was comfortable releasing to the
grimoire. Works in either direction.
Eric
-
[SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Spencer Ogden, 07/25/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Eric Womack, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Andrew Stitt, 07/26/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, bluebird, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Tobias Marx, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,, Phil/CERisE/KG6MBQ, 07/27/2002
-
[SM-Discuss] Sorcery Busted? This is a new one,,,,
Bearcat M. Sandor, 07/27/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Dufflebunk, 07/26/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Ari Steinberg, 07/25/2002
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] stable/testing branches,
Eric Womack, 07/25/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.