permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: permaculture
List archive
- From: dhondt <dhondt@eircom.net>
- To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [permaculture] Earthships
- Date: Thu, 28 Jul 2016 21:14:43 +0100
On 28/07/16 05:51, Toby Hemenway wrote:
Scott’s comments are excellent. I would add that the rate at which a treeI'm wondering whether this is obviously true Toby. Even when the growth rings get thinner does not necessarily mean that not tree does not make more timber.
sequesters carbon is also dependent on where the other trees are . Nearly all
species of trees slow their growth rate enormously once the canopy closes as
they compete with other trees for light and nutrients. I’ve looked at tree
rings on many species of both hardwoods and softwoods, and the pattern is
universal: fast growth (fat growth rings) for the first 20-60 years, then
only slow growth after that. They store most of their carbon in youth.
This is basically a cylinder with ever expanding radius. A small expansion in radius may still mean that more timber is laid down than in a tree's youth when growth rings are fatter.
John
Solution would be to selectively log when the canopy closes to open up light
gaps so the other trees can keep growing fast. Then cut those when they slow
down, and plant new trees in the gaps. Put it all in structures that last 500
years.
Cement: The minute you use even small amounts of cement, gone is all hope of
being carbon neutral; concrete is that big an energy hog. It takes hundreds
of millions of joules of energy to make a few pounds of cement. Almost
certainly the most energy intensive of any commonly used substance (cement is
#2 after water in tons transported per year).
Toby
tobyhemenway.com
Just out: my new book on urban permaculture, The Permaculture City. Order it
at your favorite bookseller or get a signed copy from me at
http://tobyhemenway.com/book/the-permaculture-city/
On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:53 PM, scott@permaculture.org wrote:
In the case of fast maturing trees that are harvested at maturity would be
excellent building materials. But trees that are still growing should be
allowed to continue to sequester carbon.
-------Original Message-------
From: Scott Vlaun <scott@moosepondarts.com>
To: permaculture <permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org>
Subject: Re: [permaculture] Earthships
Sent: Jul 27 '16 15:39
To Georg's point, sequestering carbon in well built structures made from wood
harvested sustainably. Here in Maine there are short lived, fast growing
species like balsam and poplar that make decent building materials and would
otherwise die and quickly release carbon as they rot in the forest.
Scott Vlaun
Center for an Ecology-Based Economy 207 520 0575
On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:33 PM, Scott Vlaun <scott@moosepondarts.com> wrote
My mother in law lives in a 25 year old earthship in NM. I've spent a lot of
time in it and it is pretty fantastic. Can and bottle walls eliminate a lot
of carbon intensive concrete as do massive Adobe thermal mass walls. The
sculptural aspects, especially tile mosaic make for a very Inspired living
space. Embodied energy per sq. ft. on these structures is extremely low and
even in northern NM she gets by on less than. Cord of wood per year, only
needed when cold and cloudy. I'm extremely sensitive to tire outgassing and
have never even gotten a whit. Labor intensive to be sure though!
To
Scott Vlaun
Center for an Ecology-Based Economy 207 520 0575
On Jul 27, 2016, at 5:07 PM, Georg Parlow <g.parlow@gmx.at> wrote:
Thanks Lawrence and Scott for this dialogue. Valuable.
However, one question, Scott:
**Whenever possible eliminate using forest products in construction. TheTo my understanding wood IS a carbon sink - and if it sits in my house for
wood is much better used as a carbon sink.
200+ years this is just as fine as sitting (and maybe falling over and
rotting) in the forest. What is it I do not see?
Georg
permaculture mailing list
permaculture@lists.ibiblio.org
subscribe/unsubscribe|user config|list info:
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/permaculture
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships
, (continued)
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Lawrence London, 07/26/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Bob Waldrop, 07/26/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
scott, 07/27/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Georg Parlow, 07/27/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Scott Vlaun, 07/27/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Scott Vlaun, 07/27/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, scott, 07/27/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Lawrence London, 07/27/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Toby Hemenway, 07/28/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Lawrence London, 07/28/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, dhondt, 07/28/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, ossi, 07/31/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, scott, 07/31/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Toby Hemenway, 07/31/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Scott Vlaun, 07/27/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Georg Parlow, 07/27/2016
-
Re: [permaculture] Earthships,
Lawrence London, 07/26/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, scott, 07/27/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, Lawrence London, 07/26/2016
- Re: [permaculture] Earthships, scott, 07/27/2016
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.