internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
- From: Michael Czeiszperger <michael AT czeiszperger.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 12:06:51 -0400
On Jun 5, 2007, at 11:37 AM, zman wrote:
Like I said, I am a non-smoker. But being told that someone can't do
something (within reason) in my establishment makes me really want to deny
them access, which I can do. I'm against this kind of fascism. I do as
much as I can for ventilation to accomodate my patrons. I comply with city
and state codes. I don't need nannie andie telling me what to do now.
As a fellow small-business owner, I think we can both agree that the less the government is involved in our businesses, the better. The problem is that the government does have a responsibility to set some regulations for the greater good, the Clean Air Act and other regulations pertaining to keeping the water supply clean are just two examples.
In this case, even the Bush Administration has found that smoking in confined areas is a significant health risk:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/27/ AR2006062700710.html
I firmly believe that people should be allowed to smoke if they want to, the problem is that a smoker's right to smoke is eclipsed by the non-smokers right not to be affected by second hand smoke; the rights to clean air and clean water are fundamental.
________________________________________________________________________ _________
If you put up a large switch in a cave somewhere, with a sign on it saying "End-
of-the-World Switch. PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH", the paint wouldn't even have time
to dry. -- Pratchett
-- michael at czeiszperger dot org, Chapel Hill, NC
-
[internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis]
, (continued)
- [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], matusiak, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], Magnus, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], Jim Allman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], Scott Lundgren, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], Tanner Lovelace, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Diverge [was: Brazilian String Bikinis], Scott Lundgren, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Greg Brown, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, jason Tower, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Michael Czeiszperger, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Phillip Rhodes, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Magnus, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Cristóbal Palmer, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Cristóbal Palmer, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Michael Czeiszperger, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Magnus, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Cristóbal Palmer, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, David Minton, 06/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.