Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

[zman <zman AT shell.neverwhere.org>]

On Tue, 5 Jun 2007, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
> Not allowing black people in private businesses has NOTHING to do with
> a black person's right to be active in society, as said black person
> has the CHOICE of not visiting establishments that don't allow black
> people.
>
> As Jim Ray's example points out.. some businesses will voluntarily
> choose to allow black people, for whatever reason (maybe the owners
> aren't racist, maybe they just think it's better for business,
> whatever).
>
> The bottom line is, if you like black people, and Business Foo doesn't
> allow black people, you don't have to shop / dine / drink / whatever
> at Business Foo.  Vote with your wallet and go to the competition that
> allows black people.
>
> And if  there is no competition? Well sorry, but you're not *entitled*
> to have an integrated bar, or non-racist restaurant or whatever
> available.  Sorry, but that's the way it is. You want one, lobby an
> existing business to change over, or start your own, whatever.
>
> TTYL,
>
> Horribly-parodied Phil
>
> Stop and consider your arguments, people.

Oh please, that is about the dumbest arguement ever. WTF, get off your 
nannies titty and live damnit. Trying to say allowing or not allowing 
smoking is rascist is just dumb.


Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
Kulture http://www.kulture.us
Rod-O-Rama http://www.rod-o-rama.com
Vagabonds C.C. http://www.vagabonds.cc
'57 Buick Riviera, '60 International B100
'23 Buick Roadster, '90 Ducati 750 Sport