internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
- From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
- Date: Tue, 5 Jun 2007 11:55:54 -0400
Mitch's Tavern on Hillsborough St. recently banned smoking. Now, I visit
along with my two sons when my wife has her Pilates class. Had there been
smoking, we would not go.
I smoke a cigar every once in a blue moon yet would not want to do so
indoors around non smokers. We do not allow smoking in our house yet have
an ashtray that we take to the front porch for guests.
Regards,
Jim
Jim Ray, President
Neuse River Networks
tel: 919-838-1672 cell: 919-606-1772
http://www.Neuse.Net
Connecting You to the World since 1997
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:internetworkers-
> bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Thomas Beckett
> Sent: Tuesday, June 05, 2007 11:48 AM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Andrew C. Oliver wrote:
> > I don't smoke and look forward to the day when the legislature bans it
> > in public places, as I like to be able to go in public without smoking.
> > *duck*
>
> I've heard that in places where smoking in public establishments has
> been banned that bars enjoy an increase in revenues. Where they feared
> the opposite. Discuss:
>
> - - More customers who had previously been turned off by the smoky
> environment?
>
> - - Smokers consuming more to offset their nicotine jones?
>
> - - The market decided that a smoking ban is a good thing?
>
> Thomas
> - --
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> Thomas A. Beckett, JD & MBA Business Law and Consulting
> 828-713-1668 <http://www.tbeckett.com> 919-824-5696
> Authentication instructions: <http://www.tbeckett.com/verification.html>
> - ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (MingW32)
>
> iD8DBQFGZYWXEMCfelopa1cRAiUnAJ9uLs9hpHRIxK0Ai3JBIHU1aPMWwQCggvA
> U
> GBEbzj4P2UhJMCgPqEzB4fs=
> =X8hL
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Cristóbal Palmer, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian Ammunition Belts - OT?, Thomas Beckett, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian Ammunition Belts - OT?, David Minton, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian Ammunition Belts - OT?, Magnus, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Thomas Beckett, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, zman, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Tanner Lovelace, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Jim Ray, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Thomas Beckett, 06/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Brazilian String Bikinis - OT?, Jim Ray, 06/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.