internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Tony Spencer <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?
- Date: Mon, 5 Mar 2007 14:43:59 -0500
Michael didn't make any attempt to imply it is bug free. All he said is that he's used it for years and hasn't run into any bugs.
I appreciated his opinion on a piece of software that has worked for him and didn't find Mr. Palmer's comments particularly helpful. Of course Michael may not have run into an 'edge case' but I sincerely doubt he's interested in extensive QA testing on the product.
On Mar 5, 2007, at 2:13 PM, Tanner Lovelace wrote:
On 3/5/07, Michael Czeiszperger <michael AT czeiszperger.org> wrote:
On Mar 5, 2007, at 11:21 AM, Cristóbal Palmer wrote:
On 3/5/07, Michael Czeiszperger <michael AT czeiszperger.org> wrote:
but in the years we've
used it have never encountered a single bug. We've filed some
requests for new features, but never a bug.
Then your company doesn't make great use of it, or you're lucky enough
to have never encountered an edge case. Neither case says that much
about the software. If you haven't used it enough to see its flaws,
you haven't used it enough to endorse it.
Gosh, you know so much about it from so little information.
UNC-CH SILS Student -- ils.unc.edu/~cmpalmer
That explains so much...
Michael,
Ad-hominem attacks not only contribute nothing to the discussion,
they actively hurt it. Please refrain from them.
As a software engineer, myself, though, with almost 15 years
of experience, and as someone who has set up and run several
wiki setups, I have to agree with Cristobal. If you haven't yet
found bugs in a product, then you haven't looked hard enough.
Software is too complex to not have any bugs at all. I wish
that were not true, but it is. Your "endorsement" however,
glosses over that and makes it seem like it's bug free.
Now, I freely admit I've never used the product, and I make
no judgment at all as to exactly how bug free it is, but I
can guarantee that it is not completely bug free.
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace
clubjuggler at gmail dot com
http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
(fieldless) In fess two roundels in pale, a billet fesswise and an
increscent, all sable.
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http:// www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ internetworkers
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
zman, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Andrew C. Oliver, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Andrew C. Oliver, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
burnett, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
burnett, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Cristóbal Palmer, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Andrew C. Oliver, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
- Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?, Cristóbal Palmer, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 03/05/2007
-
Re: [internetworkers] Wiki?,
zman, 03/05/2007
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.