internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Sil Greene <Sil_greene AT unc.edu>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
- Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 15:35:03 -0500 (EST)
Reported 04.01.06 13:46 from Michael Czeiszperger:
.:On Jan 6, 2004, at 10:34 AM, Stuart Holcombe wrote:
.:> The company that started this VOIP trend is Vonage
.:> (http://www.vonage.com/). Their basic
.:> unlimited plan is $24.99, which I believe is less than TW.
.:
.:According to the Vonage web site, the identical plan to RR, i.e.
.:unlimited local and long distance is $34.99, the same price as RR.
Mmm.. I thought the TW service was $44.95, or $39.95 if you qualify for
the $5 discount (ie, you already buy RR service from them). But maybe
they like you and are giving you an additional $5 discount.
--
"If you put your supper dish to your ears you can hear the sounds
of a restaurant." --Snoopy (Charles Schultz 02-12-2000 RIP)
Sil_Greene AT unc.edu
-
Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com
, (continued)
-
Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
James Manning, 01/05/2004
- Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Edward Wesolowski, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Thomas Beckett, 01/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Kurt Schlatzer, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
James Z. Godwin, 01/06/2004
-
[internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, David R . Matusiak, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Shea Tisdale, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Stuart Holcombe, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Mark Turner, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
-
Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Jeremy Portzer, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
K. Jo Garner, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, zman, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
K. Jo Garner, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Stuart Holcombe, 01/06/2004
-
[internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
James Z. Godwin, 01/06/2004
-
Re: Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
James Manning, 01/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.