Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] Re: Satellite Connections

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] Re: Satellite Connections
  • Date: Tue, 6 Jan 2004 17:33:17 -0500

Satellite for tv, not internet.

-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Ken Pugh
Sent: Tuesday, January 06, 2004 1:23 PM
To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: [internetworkers] Re: Satellite Connections


I know someone who's tried satellite. They're up in Maine. The connection
works fine if nobody else is on. It bogs down to less than dialup speed in
the middle of the day.

Cable has the same problem when there are lots of connections on a trunk,
but it's probably much less noticeable since the total bandwidth is a lot
higher.

Ken

At 12:05 PM 1/6/2004, you wrote:
>i haven't had any problems with rr isp yet want to get some static ips
>and host some domains on dsl at portbridge. i'd also like to try
>satellite instead of cable because WKNC blasts me with rf and
>completely wipes out ch 6 tv.


---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page