internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
- Date: Wed, 7 Jan 2004 11:11:15 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
argh, the nextels....i think anyone with a nextel phone should have to sit in a room full of other people talking on them for 2 hours before they can activate theirs, so they an see how terribly annoying they are
~Ian
- -------------------------
What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to authenticate this email. For more information, check out http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
On Jan 7, 2004, at 10:07 AM, zman wrote:
On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, K. Jo Garner wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Because cell phones are nothing more than glorified CB radios.
Breaker 19, I got Rubber Ducky on the backdoor....
especially those damn Nextels.
--
Scott H. Zekanis
zman AT kungfumonkey.com
http://www.rod-o-rama.com
http://www.thehellbenders.com
1957 Buick Riviera Hardtop (2 dr., 364" Nailhead)
1959 GMC in Chevy Sheetmetal 1/2 Ton (235" Inline 6)
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (Darwin)
iD8DBQE//C+jDaRr/N2jLBARAgxsAJ40UR5ZXPnnCU9uJ7jLkCZEn4kQXACgoCvi
KQrLG1akZ+do3CTfGc/QL4s=
=uSom
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, David R . Matusiak, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Shea Tisdale, 01/06/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Stuart Holcombe, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Mark Turner, 01/06/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Michael Czeiszperger, 01/06/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
-
Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Jeremy Portzer, 01/07/2004
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
K. Jo Garner, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, zman, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Tanner Lovelace, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
K. Jo Garner, 01/07/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?,
Stuart Holcombe, 01/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.