internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Thomas C. Meggs" <tom AT plik.net>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 17:07:33 -0500
I definitely think the key here is either to:
(1) Run underground wires or
(2) Have more houses off the grid. ;)
Regards,
Tom
David R. Matusiak wrote:
yeah, the electric wires over and above my house are an eyesore, too. and occasionally a pain in the a** when they all get ripped off by haphazard free-growing trees! i push for a new form of "Tree Efficient" Urbanism, where there is less chance of a million people losing power for a week.
we could either:
A: hack down all the trees (don't think the granolas would go for this)
-or-
B: maybe spend the extra dough to put this ugly/dangerous crap underground?
ah well. one can dream...
/drm
On Tuesday, January 7, 2003, at 04:48 PM, Victor Minton wrote:
Hi,
I believe GM was more interested in replacing trolleys with buses, rather
then selling cars during the great Depression.. Buses were perceived to be
more flexible, more modern and did not require dedicated lanes in urban
areas. The overhead electric wires were considered eyesores as well.
Different times,
Vic Minton
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism
, (continued)
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: New Urbanism, Lance A. Brown, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Diane M. Kurilecz, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Victor Minton, 01/08/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.