internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Victor Minton <victor AT designhammer.com>
- To: <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 16:48:37 -0500
Hi,
I believe GM was more interested in replacing trolleys with buses, rather
then selling cars during the great Depression.. Buses were perceived to be
more flexible, more modern and did not require dedicated lanes in urban
areas. The overhead electric wires were considered eyesores as well.
Different times,
Vic Minton
> Oh yeah, I know a good bit about National City Lines and General Motors
> pulling up the tracks. But I think it's hard to call it a conspiracy
> theory. The thing is, at the time people thought cars were modern, and
> the way to go. Just like Internet Access. ;) People perceived taking the
> rail up almost as an infrastructure improvement, so I think that's why
> not many complained.
>
> Regards,
> Tom
>
> Edward Wesolowski wrote:
>> For folks who tend toward conspiracy theory there's an interesting
>> documentary, "Taken for a Ride," about transition in the U.S. from
>> street cars to automobiles. The doc describes the role of a large
>> automobile manufacturer (that shall go unnamed ;-) and it's relation to
>> the "National City Lines"? ...anyone heard of National City Lines"?
>> Ed Wesolowski
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Parker, David X, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: New Urbanism, Lance A. Brown, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Diane M. Kurilecz, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.