internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Edward Wesolowski <ids AT idisplay.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism
- Date: Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:43:29 -0500
>Imagine if you could get on a train in downtown Chapel Hill and wind up in Raleigh less then 15 minutes later? Of course it >would be even better if Raleigh had half way decent land use. ;)
For folks who tend toward conspiracy theory there's an interesting documentary, "Taken for a Ride," about transition in the U.S. from street cars to automobiles. The doc describes the role of a large automobile manufacturer (that shall go unnamed ;-) and it's relation to the "National City Lines"? ...anyone heard of National City Lines"?
Ed Wesolowski
At 01:26 PM 1/7/03 -0500, you wrote:
On Tue, 7 Jan 2003, Michael Winslow Czeiszperger wrote:
> Maybe you were there a while back? The parks are integrated into and
> among the houses. The open space consists of:
Yeah it occurs to me I really don't have a good conception of the layout
of Southern Village.
> Also, good points about the relationship between the automobile and
> suburban land use. I have a picture of my grandparent's house which was
> built 150 years ago. The picture is about 100 years old, and you can
> clearly see the light rail system that connected all of the towns in
> those days.
Yeah, it's kind of baffling. We used to have light rail all over the
country and in almost every city.
> I don't think the point is to not drive at all, at least not for
> everyone, but rather to reduce the number of car trips. Theoretically
> if you reduce the number of hours everyone in the neighborhood is in
> their cars you can support the increased density and population without
> affecting the road system nearly as much as a traditional suburb.
Absolutely, car's do have a place, but not in population centers. They
just don't scale. In fact, repeatedly it has been shown that all building
new roads does is increase congestion, because people drive more. It is
an endless battle. The only way to cut congestion is to not drive. Good,
safe, and reliable public transportation should be provided.
Imagine if you could get on a train in downtown Chapel Hill and wind up in
Raleigh less then 15 minutes later? Of course it would be even better if
Raleigh had half way decent land use. ;)
Regards,
Tom
---
Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site! http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
To unsubscribe visit http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Parker, David X, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
- [internetworkers] Re: New Urbanism, Lance A. Brown, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Shea Tisdale, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, David R. Matusiak, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Edward Wesolowski, 01/08/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Poplarism, Shea Tisdale, 01/08/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Victor Minton, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Edward Wesolowski, 01/07/2003
- Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
- RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism, Diane M. Kurilecz, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Thomas C. Meggs, 01/07/2003
-
Re: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Michael Winslow Czeiszperger, 01/07/2003
-
RE: [internetworkers] New Urbanism,
Paul Jones, 01/07/2003
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.