homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Homestead mailing list
List archive
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?
- From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
- To: rayzentz AT aim.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?
- Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2008 13:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Ray, this info happened to be on the homepage of survivalblog today. I don't
know how this fits with your specific questions, but much general info here,
in a concise manner
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Commparing the Big Three Battle Rifle Chamberings in the United States, by
Kyrottimus
Since there are probably many folks new to firearms in the recent months, it
may help to convey a sense of awe and respect for the power which they
possess. I intend to use practical examples to give the average person a
relative understanding of firearm ballistics; dealing primarily in the
overall energy they are capable of unleashing at varying ranges.
I will focus on the three most common military-spec cartridge calibers found
in semi-automatic battle rifles in the U.S.: 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Win),
7.62x39mm Soviet/Russian and 5.56x45mm NATO (.223 Rem). I will also address
some comparisons with handgun ammunition and even the .30 Carbine round.
Note: This article make fair use quotes and cites data from a variety of
references. See the References list at the end of the article for links. The
author thanks the writers of these fine references for their many hours of
research.
It is my hope that people who read this will not only further their knowledge
about firearms, but find that it may aid them in their quest for wisdom when
it comes to knowing the limitations of their weapons.
The statistics used herein are averaged and aggregated from various sources,
primarily focusing on military-spec ammunition (what most civilians wind up
buying as "military surplus" ammunition from various nations). Since most
NATO nations comply with similar cartridge standards, comparing their
attributes is easy.
When it comes to the 7.62x39mm Soviet cartridge, I averaged Tula, Vympel and
Barnaul munitions factories from Russia, since Russia is the home where the
7.62x39mm cartridge was born and standardized. While most of us know these
brands by their commercial names: Wolf Military Classic, Golden Tiger and
Brown Bear, the ammunition itself is made to Russian military specifications.
.30 Caliber Carbine (aka US .30 Carbine) is added to the analysis of modern
military cartridges to give those people who use it a realistic idea of its
limitations. Not to detract from the merits of a compact, lightweight,
easy-to-carry carbine or its light ammunition, but to compare it
apples-to-apples when it comes to net power.
All rifle cartridges used in these statistics were Full-Metal Jacket
(FMJ--meaning the entire lead bullet is encased in a cupronickel metal
covering). The .30 Carbine ammunition statistics can be applied to either FMJ
or JSP because both projectile types are the same mass, with the same
velocity and with almost identical sectional density.
As we all know, mass x velocity = energy. But it's not so simple. Let's visit
some popular mathematic formulas:
F = ma
Force equals mass times acceleration.
P = Fv
Power equals force times the constant velocity.
KE = 1/2m v2
Kinetic energy equals one half of mass times velocity squared.
So a bullet's speed (velocity) means nothing to us unless we know its mass.
Coupled together we get:
Caliber, Bullet Weight, Muzzle Energy and Muzzle Velocity
7.62x51mm NATO 147 grain (gr)~2,550 ft/lbs (3,457 joules) @ 2,700 fps (FMJ)
7.62x39mm Soviet 123 gr ~1,525 ft/lbs (2,067 joules) @ 2,360 fps (FMJ)
5.56x45mm NATO 62 gr ~1,250 ft/lbs (1,694 joules) @ 3,050 fps (FMJ)
.30 Caliber Carbine 110gr ~965 ft/lbs (1,308 joules) @ 1,995 fps (FMJ and JSP)
.45 ACP 230 gr ~390 ft/lbs (528 joules) @ 875 fps (JHP)
9x19mm Luger/Parabellum 115 gr ~385 ft/lbs (521 joules) @ 1,225 fps (JHP)
The .45 ACP (Automatic Colt Pistol) and 9x19mm pistol cartridges were added
as a comparison for those familiar with handguns and their energy at
point-blank range. At 50 yards, both standard .45 ACP and 9x19mm defense
loads are roughly equal in net energy (~350 ft/lbs or 475 joules each).
When measuring both energy and velocity at the "muzzle" of a firearm, it is
basically "point-blank range" which when describing firearms [versus
artillery] means within a few yards of the muzzle.
Now these figures are measured within a few feet of the muzzle (hence the
term "muzzle energy" or "muzzle velocity"), which is the most powerful the
projectiles will be throughout their ballistic path. Because of wind
resistance, they will decelerate (and thus lose energy) at varying distances.
This is why we get the term "effective range," as beyond a certain point the
energy is too low to be expected to be nominally effective. Also, keep in
mind some projectiles will drop rapidly as their ballistic arc terminates
(and is pulled down by gravity). The energy and velocity at ranges listed
below are assuming the shooter is holding the sights high enough to get the
projectile there before it hits the ground...at a certain point this practice
becomes futile and borders on indirect fire, going back to the concept of
"effective range."
Remember; so long as the air resistance remains constant, so too will the
rate of deceleration of the projectile.
Also, bear in mind that while some bullets travel slower than others, if they
are heavier they can have a net force which is more than the other (e.g.
7.62x39 has a muzzle velocity (MV) of 2,360 fps and the 5.56 NATO has a MV of
3,050. While the 5.56 NATO is roughly 700 fps faster at the muzzle than the
7.62x39 projectile, the 7.62x39 is almost exactly twice the mass of the 5.56
NATO).
The statistics shown here of muzzle velocity and energy are all given through
20" rifle barrels (though not certain on the .30 Carbine figures, though
since there is primarily only one common firearm which fires the cartridge,
the M1 Carbine which has an 18" barrel, it is assumed all statistics for that
cartridge are applied for a 18" barrel). The shorter a rifle barrel is, the
less time the expanding gasses from the compressed burning powder have to
accelerate the projectile before it exits the barrel (which ends acceleration
and begins deceleration due to air resistance). A 20" barreled AR-15 will
generate faster projectile velocity and higher net bullet energy (using
identical ammunition) than a 16" barreled AR-15 Carbine [such as an M4gery or
a typical civilian CAR-15].
To compare accordingly, an AK rifle and a civilian AR-15 carbine both have
16.25" barrels and thus would have roughly the same ratio of velocity and
energy (though at lower values). If one wanted to compare 20" to 20" inch,
maybe a standard length AR-15 and a Russian SKS (or even Romanian RPK) would
be a fair comparison (either may be slightly over 20" but would be a closer
comparison than a full-length AR-15 to a 16" bbl AK).
Probably the fairest means of comparison using statistics below is to assume
the cartridges were fired from the following 20" barreled rifles:
7.62x51mm NATO : FN-FAL (most have 21" barrels but many can be found with
~20" barrels)
7.62x39mm Soviet : SKS (most have ~20" barrels)
5.56x45mm NATO : AR-15 (standard size has ~20" barrel)
The measure of mass used for firearm projectiles (bullets) is grains. A grain
is a unit of lead mass measurement, roughly equal to 1/3 of a carat or 65mg.
16 grains is roughly equal to 1 gram. Note that grains in bullet mass differ
from from " grains" of smokeless powder (nitro-cellulose) propellant, which
is not used in this article.
A hard baseball is about 5-1/8 ounces or 149 grams. This equates to 2,300
grains in mass.
The energy being used is in foot-pounds of force and in joules. The best way
to describe a single foot-pound of force, "is the amount of energy expended
when a force of one pound acts through a distance of 1 foot along the
direction of the force." While not scientifically "correct," the terms
"force" and "energy" are used interchangeably in this article.
Also, keep in mind that if a bullet does not release all of its energy into a
single target, it will go through it while retaining the remainder of its
force while coming out the other side. This is why most modern handgun
projectiles are Jacketed-Hollow Points (JHPs), so they mushroom in
deformation to a larger diameter (usually ~0.72" regardless of what caliber
it started out as), thus increasing surface area and resistance in the target
medium and will then release more energy over shorter distance (basically to
prevent over-penetration at close range). Over penetration of a target means
that not all of the kinetic energy in the projectile winds up being released
in that target. From the target's perspective, that means less overall damage.
Rifle cartridges are also designed to deposit as much energy as possible in a
target in a relatively short distance. The 5.56mm NATO projectile, if within
200 yards, will often critically destabilize while acutely decelerating in a
soft target medium and fragment into many pieces; releasing its energy all at
once in a very small distance. The 7.62x39mm Soviet will usually tumble a few
times (yaw/pitch) in a soft target medium and in doing so release a spike of
its remaining energy in each tumble (and if it stops in the medium, will wind
up facing backwards). The 7.62mm NATO projectile will usually tumble once and
if it does not exit the other side of the target medium (which it usually
does at closer ranges), it will expend all of its energy into the target and
end up facing backwards--this is due to the projectile's point of balance
being closer to the rear, as the back half of most rifle projectiles are
heavier than the front. Once any of the Big Three
cartridge projectiles begin rapid deceleration in a target medium, their
centrifugal spin-stabilization (caused by the rifling in the rifle
barrel--similar to a nicely thrown "spiral" pass of an American football)
usually fails and the laws of physics continue with inertia, resistance,
velocity and mass in the target medium.
Now, let's get into the meat and potatoes of mass, velocity and energy:
A 90 mph (132 feet per second, or fps) fastball (major league baseball is 149
grams, 1/3 of a pound or 2,300 grains) exerts approximately 60 ft/lbs of
force as the pitcher releases it:
Baseball (Fastball) 2,300 grains ~60 ft/lbs (81 joules) @ 132 fps (90mph)
This may not be really easy to envision in any practical sense of energy when
thinking of foot-pounds of force, so joules are also included.
1 joule of energy is equal to the force required for an average adult human
to pick up an apple from the ground to their waist (~1m). Conversely, 1 joule
is the amount of force released when that same human drops that same apple
from that height. Since an apple weighs about the same as a baseball, a
person must exert 81 times the force needed to pick up an apple to pitch a
90mph fastball.
Now that a few rough practical examples of applied force have been given, let
us now examine the Big Three military-surplus cartridge calibers' energy at
varying distances (.30 Caliber Carbine and two pistol calibers are thrown in
as a comparison to more modern military cartridges):
Caliber, Bullet Weight, Muzzle Energy and Muzzle Velocity
7.62x51mm NATO 147 gr ~2,550 ft/lbs (3,457 joules) @ 2,700 fps (FMJ)
7.62x39mm Soviet 123 gr ~1,525 ft/lbs (2,067 joules) @ 2,360 fps (FMJ)
5.56x45mm NATO 62 gr ~1,250 ft/lbs (1,694 joules) @ 3,050 fps (FMJ)
.30 Caliber Carbine 110 gr ~965 ft/lbs (1,308 joules) @ 1,995 fps (FMJ and
JSP)
.45 ACP 230 gr ~390 ft/lbs (528 joules) @ 875 fps (JHP)
9x19mm Luger/Parabellum 115 gr ~385 ft/lbs (521 joules) @ 1,225 fps (JHP)
Energy at 100 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~2,100 ft/lbs (2,847 joules) @ 2,550 fps
7.62x39mm Soviet ~1,200 ft/lbs (1,626 joules) @ 2,104 fps
5.56x45mm NATO ~970 ft/lbs (1,315 joules) @ 2,650 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~600 ft/lbs (813 joules) @ 1,570 fps
Energy at 200 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~1,750 ft/lbs (2,374 joules) @ 2,331 fps (now moving faster
than 62 gr 5.56NATO)
7.62x39mm Soviet ~915 ft/lbs (1,240 joules) @ 1,825 fps
5.56x45mm NATO ~735 ft/lbs (995 joules) @ 2,310 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~375 ft/lbs (508 joules) @ 1,240 fps (equal in force to
230 gr .45ACP @ ~10 yards)
Energy at 300 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~1,450 ft/lbs (1,965 joules) @ 2,125 fps
7.62x39mm Soviet ~690 ft/lbs (935 joules) @ 1,585 fps
5.56x45mm NATO ~550 ft/lbs (745 joules) @ 2,000 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~265 ft/lbs (359 joules) @ 1,040 fps
Energy at 400 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~1,200 ft/lbs (1,625 joules) @ 1,931 fps (equal in force to
5.56NATO @ ~15 yards)
7.62x39mm Soviet ~515 ft/lbs (700 joules) @ 1,370 fps
5.56x45mm NATO ~405 ft/lbs (550 joules) @ 1,718 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~210 ft/lbs (284 joules) @ 930 fps
Energy at 500 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~1,000 ft/lbs (1,355 joules) @ 1,750 fps
7.62x39mm Soviet ~395 ft/lbs (535 joules) @ 1,200 fps (equal in force to
230gr .45ACP @ ~2 yards)
5.56x45mm NATO ~290 ft/lbs (393 joules) @ 1,460 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~175 ft/lbs (237 joules) @ 850 fps
Energy at 600 yards
7.62x51mm NATO ~810 ft/lbs (1,100 joules) @ 1,560 fps (equal in force to
5.56NATO @ ~150 yards)
7.62x39mm Soviet ~280 ft/lbs (379 joules) @ 1,030 fps
5.56x45mm NATO ~172 ft/lbs (233 joules) @ 1,122 fps
.30 Caliber Carbine ~135 ft/lbs (183 joules) @ 760 fps
It is plainly obvious why so many recommend a 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Win)
chambered rifle as a primary defense rifle. It clearly overpowers all other
modern, common military battle rifle calibers at all ranges and maintains a
further effective range. The few negative aspects are the relatively higher
recoil, louder report and heavier cartridge weight.
Keeping in mind the power of the aforementioned rifle calibers, and that the
more powerful cartridges weigh more, and thus the shooter would be able to
carry less ammunition when comparing a like weight (e.g. 25lbs) of
ammunition. An average adult human male can only comfortably carry about a 65
lb load on their shoulders. An average adult human female can only
comfortably carry about a 40 lb load on their shoulders. Keep that in mind
when selecting a primary defense rifle.
Penetration is another important thing to consider. So is effective range and
accuracy. Determine which pros outweigh the cons and pick your rifle(s)
accordingly. By comparing the Big Three military calibers most commonly found
in semi-automatic "battle" rifles in the U.S., I hope you have expanded your
understanding a little bit on the amount of power they each bring to bear. If
possible, I recommend getting at least one rifle in 7.62x51mm NATO (.308 Win)
and another in either 7.62x39mm Soviet or 5.56x45mm NATO (or both if you can
afford it). Heck, two of each is good too.
When it comes to the .30 Carbine cartridge and the M1 Carbine which fires it,
many will pooh-pooh its lack of "stopping" power. Many of these same
individuals will champion the .45 ACP as a great handgun cartridge. I know
one is a pistol and one is a carbine, but the M1 Carbine more or less bridges
the gap between a handgun and a battle rifle. At 200 yards, the M1 Carbine
hits with the same power as the .45ACP does at nearly point-blank range.
While the .30 Carbine cartridge in military configuration is FMJ (to abide to
the Hague Convention of War [that restricts military use of expanding
bullets], which at closer ranges can over penetrate a target and thus not
release all of its kinetic energy, there are many commercially available
sources which are loaded with JSP (Jacketed Soft Point) projectiles. These
deforming bullets are essentially the same as most hunting bullets, though
would be better as a personal defense weapon than a hunting one. Within the
effective range, they will deform and ensure that most or all of the energy
of the bullet is released in the target.
For defensive purposes, an M1 Carbine is still viable as a PDW (Personal
Defense Weapon) in your battery--especially for small-statured women and
adolescent children. A Ruger 10/22 (or Marlin 60/795) with Tech-Sights
installed has a very similar length of pull, sight picture, and balance as an
M1 Carbine. It can easily be used to train a person unfamiliar with firearms
using the inexpensive .22LR cartridge until they prove proficient enough to
graduate to a centerfire weapon--the M1 Carbine is the perfect transition
weapon from the 10/22. It is more powerful and easier to control and has a
greater effective range than most modern semi-auto handguns. While both the
.30 Carbine cartridge and the M1 Carbine firearm are both fairly outdated,
and there are better choices for a defensive rifle and cartridge, they are
still better and more versatile than any semi-auto handgun, in my opinion. If
you wind up seeing a WWII or Korean War era M1 Carbine from the
CMP, at a gun show, pawn shop or from a personal seller and it is a
reasonable price, I suggest looking into getting one. Also, a few modern
reproductions are floating around out there by IAI (Israeli Aerospace
Industries) and Auto-Ordnance (Both are good quality and American made). [JWR
Adds: The Plainfield and Iver Johnson clones were also quite well made. The
M1 Carbine reproductions to avoid were those made by Universal Industries.
Few of their parts interchange with original GI M1 Carbine parts, and their
trigger groups could best be descibed as "pot metal". They were in fact more
"look-alikes" than they were M1 Carbine clones.]
But when building your survival battery, make certain you can afford the
necessary accoutrements for each rifle; such as magazines, spare parts, web
gear/LBE, ammunition, lubricant/rust preventative, cleaning accessories, and
most of all--training. Get familiar with safety first and foremost, and move
your way into nomenclature and eventually to close, intermediate and long
range shooting with each caliber in various shooting positions to broaden
your horizons further. I also suggest that you pick up some grocery-store
throw-away produce and line them up at varying ranges to see what kind of
hydrostatic shock your rifle can produce at 400+ yards. Melons, pumpkins and
coconuts are fun to shoot. They also put all the numbers above in perspective
to what 1,000+ joules of force can do to soft tissue.
Let is all hope and pray that no one reading this will ever need to use any
firearm in their battery against another human being. But if one day we find
ourselves forced to defend our lives, family and property, then let us be
prepared to stand and fight!
References:
Chuck Hawks' Ballistics Page (Rifle Shooter magazine)
.308 Winchester Ballistics (Rifle Shooter magazine)
7.62x39 Ballistics (Rifle Shooter magazine)
.223 Ballistics (Rifle Shooter magazine)
.30 US Carbine Ballistics (Rifle Shooter magazine)
Wikipedia Page: Joule
Answers.com: Foot/Pounds
Baseball Pitching Facts and Fallacies
Rifle Shooter Magazine's Ballistics Page
TKD Tutor: The Concept of Force
The cited energy and mass conversions done using Microsoft "Convert" utility
program
Permalink - Email This
--- On Mon, 12/15/08, rayzentz AT aim.com <rayzentz AT aim.com> wrote:
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions
, (continued)
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, EarthNSky, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
Robert Walton, 12/11/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, Gene GeRue, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
Lynda, 12/12/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
rayzentz, 12/15/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
bob ford, 12/15/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, bob ford, 12/15/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?,
rayzentz, 12/15/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?, bob ford, 12/15/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?, bob ford, 12/15/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, firearms?, bob ford, 12/15/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
bob ford, 12/15/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
rayzentz, 12/15/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, eureka, 12/12/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
Leslie, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
EarthNSky, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
Cathy, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
EarthNSky, 12/11/2008
- [Homestead] Raised beds in desert conditions, Gene GeRue, 12/12/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
EarthNSky, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
Cathy, 12/11/2008
-
Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions,
EarthNSky, 12/11/2008
- Re: [Homestead] Preparation for WTSHTF questions, Lynda, 12/12/2008
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.