Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

cc-licenses - Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses

cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Development of Creative Commons licenses

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Mia Garlick <mia AT creativecommons.org>
  • To: Discussion on the Creative Commons license drafts <cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: [cc-licenses] Subject: Re: Version 3.0 - List Discussion Responses
  • Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 17:29:57 -0700

what i have said multiple different ways now is that the statute does not offer support for the provision in the license. so if CC were to introduce the provision you want in the license, then we would be exposing those who operate under the license to the risk of civil and possibly criminal action for violation of the relevant sections of 1201. you can not buy my argument forever, but CC would, i believe, be negligent as a license steward to expose anyone to such a risk regardless of how many of us disagree with the applicable law.

if you use this analogy for what you want in the license:

I'll let you
use this pasture of mine. I'll even let you put a fence around it. But
you have to promise to let anyone cut that fence in order to get to the
pasture".

what the law says is:

I, as the landowner, may let you use this pasture of mine, I may put a fence around it and I may authorize certain people to cut the fence wire. The law will not expose those who cut the fence with my consent to the risk of civil or criminal liability.

the law may also say:

I, as the owner of the fence, may authorize people to apply the fence to their land and I, as the fence owner, may consent to some people to cut the fence and the law will not expose those who cut the fence with my consent to the risk of civil or criminal liability.

what the law does not say is that:

I, as the landowner, will let you put a fence that is made by someone else on my land and then i will let you or some random other person cut that someone else's fence...

do you see what i am getting at?

On Sep 25, 2006, at 5:11 PM, Terry Hancock wrote:

Mia Garlick wrote:
this is not a productive line of ongoing discussion.

*Smile* when you try to suppress the democratic process by squashing
dissent under the iron boot of the Creative Commons ruling junta. ;-D

Seriously, I think it *is* productive, because I still don't buy your
argument.

Part of the problem, of course, is that the DMCA anti-circumvention is
*fundamentally* absurd: it's about outlawing wirecutters instead of
outlawing fence-cutting. And that's just stupid. But even if you were
going to write such a law (ironically, I think we still have a law like
that on the books somewhere -- or so various trivia books claim), it
will be pretty obvious that there are certain exceptions to it (*I*
interpret the clause in question as a codification of those obvious
exceptions). Obviously, you needed wire cutters to put the fence up in
the first place, as well as to move or cut a fence you have a legitimate
right to move.

Clearly, if I then take the same wire cutters and cut my neighbors'
fence, I'm going to be in violation -- but that's a different matter.

What we're asking for, essentially, is a license that says "I'll let you
use this pasture of mine. I'll even let you put a fence around it. But
you have to promise to let anyone cut that fence in order to get to the
pasture".

This may make it rather pointless to put a fence up in the first place
(good!), but if there's some technical reason why a fence must be put up
(e.g. to keep the cows in during normal use, or because there's a county
ordinance that says 'all pastures must be fenced'), then he can keep his
promises to both me and the county, while still promising the access
that I insist on, and not having the cows wander.

This allows pastures to remain free, even in counties where fence
ordinances are piling up.

--
Terry Hancock (hancock AT AnansiSpaceworks.com)
Anansi Spaceworks http://www.AnansiSpaceworks.com

_______________________________________________
cc-licenses mailing list
cc-licenses AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/cc-licenses





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page