b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Polycarp66 AT aol.com
- To: b-hebrew AT franklin.oit.unc.edu
- Subject: Re: Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification
- Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2000 17:58:34 EST
Subj: Re: Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification
Date: 2/14/2000 5:55:55 PM Central Daylight Time
From: Polycarp66
To: peter_kirk AT sil.org
In a message dated 2/14/2000 10:36:57 AM Central Daylight Time,
peter_kirk AT sil.org writes:
<< Well, maybe. But that is hearsay evidence which is not admissible,
even when the hearsay is from someone as trustworthy as Kitchen. Let
Kitchen or anyone else write up and publish their explanations of the
Apis bull datings. Then I'll take them seriously.
peter_kirk AT sil.org writes:
<<
In this way you may be able to falsify Rohl's general redating (though
you also need to explain his evidence from Apis bull datings etc etc).
However, I should remind you that this does not falsify Rohl's
identifications of biblical and archaeological events, except for those
who are committed to the chronology of Thiele etc based on the internal
biblical evidence. Rohl actually has two quite distinct theses, which
are link only by Thiele's questionable chronology.
>>
Didn't I just read that Kitchen explained the Apis bull datings in the part
of his interview with Rohl that ended up on the cutting-room floor?
>>
I see, you intend to hold out until the last "i" is dotted and the last "t"
is crossed.
And this is the writing that was inscribed: MENE, MENE, TEKEL, and PARSIN.
26 This is the interpretation of the matter: MENE, God has numbered the days
of your kingdom and brought it to an end; 27 TEKEL, you have been weighed in
the balances and found wanting; 28 PERES, your kingdom is divided and given
to the Medes and Persians.”
The Revised Standard Version, (New York: Oxford University Press, Inc.) 1973,
1977.
gfsomsel
-
RE: FW: Just a clarification
, (continued)
- RE: FW: Just a clarification, Ian Hutchesson, 02/13/2000
- Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/13/2000
- Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/13/2000
- Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/13/2000
- RE: Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Niels Peter Lemche, 02/13/2000
- FW: Just a clarification, Niels Peter Lemche, 02/13/2000
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Polycarp66, 02/13/2000
- Re: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/14/2000
- Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/14/2000
- RE: FW: Just a clarification, Niels Peter Lemche, 02/14/2000
- Re: Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification, Polycarp66, 02/14/2000
- Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/15/2000
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Ian Charles Hutchesson, 02/15/2000
- Re: Re[2]: FW: Just a clarification, Banyai Michael, 02/15/2000
- Re[6]: FW: Just a clarification, Peter Kirk, 02/15/2000
- Re: Re[6]: FW: Just a clarification, Polycarp66, 02/15/2000
-
Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification,
Peter Kirk, 02/16/2000
- Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification, Ian Hutchesson, 02/16/2000
-
Message not available
- Re: Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification, Dave Washburn, 02/17/2000
-
Message not available
- Dave Washburn's flame, Ian Hutchesson, 02/17/2000
-
Message not available
- Re: Re[4]: FW: Just a clarification, Dave Washburn, 02/19/2000
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.