Biblical Hebrew Forum

["Dave Washburn" <dwashbur AT nyx.net>]

> At 23.59 15/02/00 -0500, Peter Kirk wrote:
> >Have you read how Rohl to deals with the falsification (I assume you 
> >mean of his cnronology rather than of the standard one), which is in 
> >his appendix? Rohl is not irrelevant as he attempts to do just what 
> >you ask "one" to do. He may or may not be successful, you have no way 
> >to tell until you READ THE MATERIAL!!!
> 
> There is no point, if the thesis has been falsified. How many times do you
> want the basic ages in chaos theory falsified, Peter? I don't care if it is
> Rohl, Velikovsky, James, Bimson, or anyone else. If the basic idea don't
> work, it don't work, no matter how loud you or Rohl cry, "READ THE
> MATERIAL!!!"

Peter, if this doesn't make it clear that Ian just doesn't get it, then 
nothing will.  I suspect you and I have better things to do than put 
up with this kind of drivel.  Ian's approach is "I already know 
everything so don't confuse me" and that's obviously where his 
comfort zone is.  He's not going to read the material, he would 
rather tout his ignorance.  Fine, I suggest that we let him and get 
on to discussing things with actual scholars.


Dave Washburn
http://www.nyx.net/~dwashbur
Teach me your way, O Lord, and I will walk in your truth;
give me an undivided heart that I may fear your name.
                                   Psalm 86:11