Biblical Hebrew Forum

[Polycarp66 AT aol.com]

In a message dated 2/13/2000 2:56:11 PM Central Daylight Time, 
peter_kirk AT sil.org writes:

<< 
 In this way you may be able to falsify Rohl's general redating (though 
 you also need to explain his evidence from Apis bull datings etc etc). 
 However, I should remind you that this does not falsify Rohl's 
 identifications of biblical and archaeological events, except for 
 those who are committed to the chronology of Thiele etc based on the 
 internal biblical evidence. Rohl actually has two quite distinct 
 theses, which are link only by Thiele's questionable chronology.
  >>

Didn't I just read that Kitchen explained the Apis bull datings in the part 
of his interview with Rohl that ended up on the cutting-room floor?

gfsomsel