Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

sm-discuss - Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement

sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Maurizio Boriani <baux AT sourcemage.org>
  • To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement
  • Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:25:41 +0100

On 2006-03-16 15:51:59 +0100 David Kowis <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:

Before this gets too much into harping on individual SCM's I'm going to
point out that BearPerson and I had a lengthy discussion over SVN vs
Bazaar-NG.

if SCM should be changed (from p4 to something else) should be a
choice done by vote from sourcemage developers (all teams, from
cauldron to grimoire, sorrcery etc...)

[...]

My point here is, any SCM can be made to do what we want it to do.

don't agree...

The
focus will be what does it the easiest, fastest, lowest learning curve,
and is the most stable. So, I'm going to recommend against the simple
"yeah <insert scm here> does that" and instead ask that it's said how
it's done and what steps are involved.

In the svn vs bzr example, there's like 3 or 4 steps to doing a
changeset in svn, but in bzr it's only one or two.


in gnuarch to in one or two steps (bzr is a gnuarch fork :) )

My two cents.

mine too :))


--
Maurizio Boriani
GPG key: 0xCC0FBF8F
=> E429 A37C 5259 763C 9DEE FC8B 5D61 C796 CC0F BF8F <=





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page