sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Robert Figura <rfigura AT aubergine.zwischengesicht.de>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement
- Date: Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:10:17 +0100
Am Wednesday 15 March 2006 17:25 schrieb Sergey A. Lipnevich:
> Also, this article is quite interesting:
> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.subversion.devel/74355
Quite interesting, indeed. I'd like to second the problem of potential
developers jumping off the train because of p4. Also i see a lot of gain in
using a distributed scm.
The main question to me remains what are the requirements to a scm to be
used on grimoires. I personally have switched to mercurial after using cvs
for ten years. I like it because it is small (spell: lacks features). Also
because it's implementation seems quite clean to me and also is small.
I can imagine that the lack of features may be a problem but i can't reach
the argument. I'd be happy if someone could point out what features are
used for what purposes. I think this might be of public interest and worth
to put it on the list.
Hm. I should work on getting devel access again :)
Regards
- Robert Figura
--
/* mandlsig.c v0.23 (c) by Robert Figura */
I=1702;float O,o,i;main(l){for(;I--;putchar("oO .,\nm>cot.bitamea\
@urigrf <raguFit erobR"[I%74?I>837&874>I?I^833:l%5:5]))for(O=o=l=
0;O*O+o*o<(16^l++);o=2*O*o+I/74/11.-1,O=i)i=O*O-o*o+I%74*.04-2.2;}
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote, Andrew, 03/21/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote, Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/17/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Seth Woolley, 03/13/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Mathieu L., 03/14/2006
-
[SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Pieter Lenaerts, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote, Sergey A. Lipnevich, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Robert Figura, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Maurizio Boriani, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, David Kowis, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Karsten Behrmann, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Arwed von Merkatz, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Andrew "ruskie" Levstik, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, David Kowis, 03/16/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Matthew Clark, 03/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Pieter Lenaerts, 03/15/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Eric Sandall, 03/20/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
- Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement, Maurizio Boriani, 03/16/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Jeremy Blosser (emrys), 03/14/2006
-
[SM-Discuss] SCM perforce replacement was: Re: Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Seth Woolley, 03/14/2006
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] Grimoire Team Lead vote,
Mathieu L., 03/14/2006
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.