sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic])
- From: Seth Alan Woolley <seth AT positivism.org>
- To: Karsten Behrmann <BearPerson AT gmx.net>
- Cc: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic])
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 11:51:48 -0800
On Thu, Jan 27, 2005 at 08:38:06PM +0100, Karsten Behrmann wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:21:48 -0600 (CST)
> "David Kowis" <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
> <snip>
> > Thinking about nice installer scripts, that framebuffer gtk deal. I need
> > to make the current installer script functions able to be called from that
> > so that it's easy. I'm not even sure that would be a good idea. It might
> > be easier then to write a graphical installer in perl with perl installer
> > functions.
> Hey, why is everyone starting to talk about graphical installers?
> Sure, they're nice, but consider,
> how many people use vcast or xsorcery? (I know 90% of the people who read
> this don't even know what I'm talking about)
> All of sorcery is console-based, I think it would be a little
> lying-on-the-package if the installer was graphical.
> If they get a text-based installer on the ISO, they know what to expect
> on the installed system.
> Just my 2 cents about graphical installers
> So Far,
> Karsten
Agreed!
--
Seth Alan Woolley [seth at positivism.org], SPAM/UCE is unauthorized
Key id EF10E21A = 36AD 8A92 8499 8439 E6A8 3724 D437 AF5D EF10 E21A
http://smgl.positivism.org:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0xEF10E21A
Security Team Leader Source Mage GNU/Linux http://www.sourcemage.org
Attachment:
pgpvWSfFUQqKf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic]
, (continued)
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Seth Alan Woolley, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Cory S, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.