sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
[SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic])
- From: Karsten Behrmann <BearPerson AT gmx.net>
- To: sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic])
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 20:38:06 +0100
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005 07:21:48 -0600 (CST)
"David Kowis" <dkowis AT shlrm.org> wrote:
<snip>
> Thinking about nice installer scripts, that framebuffer gtk deal. I need
> to make the current installer script functions able to be called from that
> so that it's easy. I'm not even sure that would be a good idea. It might
> be easier then to write a graphical installer in perl with perl installer
> functions.
Hey, why is everyone starting to talk about graphical installers?
Sure, they're nice, but consider,
how many people use vcast or xsorcery? (I know 90% of the people who read
this don't even know what I'm talking about)
All of sorcery is console-based, I think it would be a little
lying-on-the-package if the installer was graphical.
If they get a text-based installer on the ISO, they know what to expect
on the installed system.
Just my 2 cents about graphical installers
So Far,
Karsten
Attachment:
pgpDLuk9Ff5cU.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Seth Alan Woolley, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Cory S, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.