sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Public SourceMage Discussion List
List archive
- From: Eric Sandall <eric AT sandall.us>
- To: SM Discuss <sm-discuss AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic]
- Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 09:47:44 -0800 (PST)
On Thu, 27 Jan 2005, Andrew wrote:
- I'll be happy if we decide to use BearPerson's scripts. They have beenI think thats what this discussion is for so an educated descision can
written from scratch with a new modular design. I should point out
however that both scripts cannot be merged together in a near future, so
deciding which scripts we will be using is a key decision. I'm
requesting here a clear statement from Unet or sandalle on this topic,
to avoid wasting my time on maintaining the current set of scripts.
Deadline: 2005-02-01.
be made and so we can move forward once and for all. Eric, Unet can you
guys decide by this deadline?
I'm hoping for a decision this week if we can discuss which scripts to
use, which to merge, and where we want to go with them. :)
<snip>
Moreover, I cannot fix a bug than I'm unable to
reproduce myself without some help (I requested some help on bug #7642
[2], but even the developper that were able to reproduce the problem did
not give any information). So far, my criteria was to run twice "sorcery
rebuild" on the installed system to ensure that people will not have
problem casting spells.
Thats why there are more people on the team than you, so you dont have
to fix every bug. We work as a team.
And also why I'd like test ISOs to be released and announced to the
lists, which you did, thanks. :)
Btw, thanks for your latest test isos. I appreciate all the hard work
you put in.
I concur.
-Andrew
-sandalle
--
Eric Sandall | Source Mage GNU/Linux Developer
eric AT sandall.us | http://www.sourcemage.org/
http://eric.sandall.us/ | SysAdmin @ Inst. Shock Physics @ WSU
http://counter.li.org/ #196285 | http://www.shock.wsu.edu/
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation
, (continued)
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 01/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Andrew, 01/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation, Karsten Behrmann, 01/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 01/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation, Andrew, 01/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation, Eric Sandall, 01/26/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation, David Kowis, 01/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Benoit PAPILLAULT, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Eric Sandall, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation [back on-topic], Andrew, 01/27/2005
- [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Karsten Behrmann, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Seth Alan Woolley, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), David Kowis, 01/27/2005
- Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO: Graphical installers (was: ISO generation [back on-topic]), Cory S, 01/27/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] OFF-TOPIC bi-arch request WAS: ISO generation,
Andrew, 01/26/2005
-
Re: [SM-Discuss] ISO generation,
Laurent Wandrebeck, 01/26/2005
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.