Mounted search and rescue

["Barry Wells" <barrywells@tds.net>]

I have had good luck with the

AERO-VESTT - WILDLAND by True North

You can add a speed belt along with either a butt-pack or a their GO!pack.

-----Original Message-----
From: msar-riders-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:msar-riders-bounces@lists.ibiblio.org]On Behalf Of Jeff Hasse
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 9:08 AM
To: Mounted search and rescue
Subject: Re: [MSAR] BackPack Question


The modular style wildland firefighting packs have some advantages for SAR
work and some distinct disadvantages.

The main advantage is that you can quickly switch out modules for different
types of missions.

The main disadvantage in my opinion is that this modularity comes at the
expense of comfort.  While the harness system of the Coaxsher packs
(Endeavor and Recon) is beefy, the load distribution is suboptimal.  For
maximum comfort, you want the weight of your gear to be placed as high and
close to your body as possible.  This places it close to your center of
gravity.  The farther away the load is from the center of gravity, the more
energy you have to put into bringing the weight forward (and the heavier the
pack feels).  In addition, this type of pack lacks internal stays which
allow weight to be transferred to the waistbelt (which significantly reduces
the utility of this beefy waistbelt).  Most people find it more comfortable
to carry weight on their hips than shoulders.

A pack also has to fit your frame well to feel good on your back.  I suspect
that this is part of your problem.  Pack manufacturers for the outdoor
recreation community have responded well to the needs of small-statured
women.  You will likely find the best variety of choices there.  For most
searches, I use an older tear-drop shaped Lowe Alpine Contour Mountain 40.
For multi-day stuff, I use a smaller North Face pack.  Both are comfortable
and rugged enough for off-trail use.

    For this weekend, I would suggest trying to get as much weight high and
close to the body as possible.  Don't over pack the bag that sits next to
the lumbar region of your back.  Good luck and have fun!

Jeff

----- Original Message -----
From: "Lila Corey" <Caballera@embarqmail.com>
To: "Mounted search and rescue" <msar-riders@lists.ibiblio.org>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2010 10:23 AM
Subject: Re: [MSAR] Standards for mounted SAR


>I realize this in not in keeping with the exact conversation here, but I
> need to know what type of back pack is working for people who are not only
> older (late 50's) searchers, but smaller in stature too?  I bought a
> Coaxsher, and even though it is constucted nicely, it seems to be a lot of
> weight.  I realize the support system in it makes it a little heavier, and
> that may offset the disadvantage of weight?  I am going on a wilderness
> survival training this weekend and have packed and repacked trying to
> eliminate weight.   Most of the time, I am using my horse, but this
> training
> requires all foot work.
>
> Lila


_______________________________________________
MSAR-Riders mailing list
MSAR-Riders@lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/msar-riders