internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
- To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
- Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 15:16:54 -0500
well although david tried to make the case that its unacceptable to compare
events in history to today, he gave himself away when he did just that:
"but i can tell you without question, George W. Bush is no FDR."
now that we know he can compare a previous president to the current, will he
answer the question?
was it wrong for FDR to use pearl harbor in his presidential campaign
material?
YES or NO?
> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
> Of Ian Meyer
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 2:57 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> i disagree. i think it is the same as what you did. to take
> something from a bygone era since since which politics have
> changed greatly and use it to refute an attack on a current topic.
>
> ~ian
>
>
> - -------------------------
> What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu
> Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to
> authenticate this email.
> For more information, check out
> http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
>
>
> On Mar 5, 2004, at 2:51 PM, Frye, Matthew wrote:
>
> >
> > <snip>
> >
> > so, if a candidate had their competition "eliminated"
> sometime in the
> > past 100 years, it would be "okay" for one to do it present day?
> >
> > That's a completely ludicrous example.
> >
> > ---
> > Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> > http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> > You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list To
> > unsubscribe visit
> > http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
> >
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
>
> iD8DBQFASNtvDaRr/N2jLBARArA3AJ9asKpzE0HbHj92Kllq/883KRf0gwCfbIO1
> MeDU24VqqfudxxJsK72DN/g=
> =9Swq
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
, (continued)
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Sil Greene, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tanner Lovelace, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Phillip Rhodes, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ron Thigpen, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Follow the money - WAS: fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Follow the money - WAS: fury over WTC ads, David R . Matusiak, 03/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Follow the money - WAS: fury over WTC ads, Ron Thigpen, 03/18/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Frye, Matthew, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Ron Thigpen, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Shea Tisdale, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
James Dasher, 03/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads, Don Rua, 03/08/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
David R . Matusiak, 03/05/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Tony Spencer, 03/05/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads,
Ian Meyer, 03/05/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.