Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

internetworkers - RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads

internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: "Tony Spencer" <tony AT tonyspencer.com>
  • To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: RE: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
  • Date: Fri, 5 Mar 2004 16:10:38 -0500

One more question:

If Kerry were to use imagery from the Vietnam war and speak about dying
soldiers in an ad for his presidential campaign, would that be offensive as
well?



> -----Original Message-----
> From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
> [mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf
> Of David R.Matusiak
> Sent: Friday, March 05, 2004 3:43 PM
> To: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> Subject: Re: [internetworkers] fury over WTC ads
>
> it seems as if no method of persuasion or logic is going to
> have any effect. all that must happen is for me to answer
> this question, without due consideration to its relevancy in
> our current place and time.
>
> what is my personal opinion? what do i think, regardless of
> my employer, saviour, political affiliation, or gender?
> well, in my personal unfettered opinion,
>
> YES - i think it was wrong for FDR to use that tack as a
> campaign slogan.
>
> i believe we must honor our soldiers, living and dead, but i
> think that using their sacrifice as a political gambit is deplorable.
>
> that, and i think that the whole 1940s/50s way of thinking
> (which included such greats as "Remember Pearl Harbor") did a
> whole lot to engender hatred and bigotry towards Asian
> peoples and Asian-Americans for the past 50+ years.
>
> i think we have to change things quite a bit (like our
> attitudes) if we are going to see ANY improvement in our
> lifetimes. thus, you can see that i am not in agreement with
> the "Things must stay as they are"
> party.
>
> On Mar 5, 2004, at 3:16 PM, Tony Spencer wrote:
>
> > well although david tried to make the case that its unacceptable to
> > compare events in history to today, he gave himself away
> when he did
> > just that:
> >
> > "but i can tell you without question, George W. Bush is no FDR."
> >
> > now that we know he can compare a previous president to the
> current,
> > will he answer the question?
> >
> > was it wrong for FDR to use pearl harbor in his
> presidential campaign
> > material?
> > YES or NO?
>
> ---
> Come and play at the InterNetWorkers Web site!
> http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
> You are currently subscribed to InterNetWorkers mailing list
> To unsubscribe visit
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/internetworkers
>
>





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page