internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.
- From: Tom Boucher <trekkie AT nomorestars.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.
- Date: Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:36:00 -0500
On Feb 23, 2004, at 12:45 AM, Thomas Woods wrote:
If same sex marriages are recognized by the stated, should two brothers be allowed to marry? The reason the law forbids marriage between brother and sister is the medical effects of inbreeding. This medical effect would not apply to a marriage which cannot, by definition, create biological offspring. So why not allow it? But, if we allow two brothers to marry, and not a brother and a sister, are we not denying the heterosexual "couple" a right that would be freely granted to the two brothers? Maybe it would be ok if either the brother or sister was willing to undergo surgery to become sterile....
Never been to Arkansas before have you ?
Sorry couldn't resist.
-
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Sil Greene, 02/20/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Jim Ray, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
David R . Matusiak, 02/20/2004
- [internetworkers] fringe equipment update, Alan MacHett, 02/20/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Michael Czeiszperger, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Paul Smith, 02/20/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Edward Wesolowski, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Tom Boucher, 02/21/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Phillip Rhodes, 02/21/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Thomas Woods, 02/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Tom Boucher, 02/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Ian Meyer, 02/23/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Dan Wilson, 02/20/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing., Frye, Matthew, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Dan Wilson, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
K. Jo Garner, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Tony Spencer, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Jim Ray, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Civil Disobedience (was: Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.),
Phillip Rhodes, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Civil Disobedience (was: Interesting SWF onthe gay marriage thing.),
Jim Ray, 02/20/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Civil Disobedience (was: Interesting SWF onthe gay marriage thing.), Phillip Rhodes, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Civil Disobedience (was: Interesting SWF onthe gay marriage thing.),
Jim Ray, 02/20/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] Civil Disobedience (was: Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.),
Phillip Rhodes, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Jim Ray, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
Tony Spencer, 02/20/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] Interesting SWF on the gay marriage thing.,
K. Jo Garner, 02/20/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.