internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Ian Meyer <ianmeyer AT mac.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 10:23:16 -0500
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Down south in Harnett County, they/we are a dry county. ABC stores, yes, anything else, no. You *can* get beer/wine at the grocery store though.
So anyway, last year, or was it 2 years ago, I don't remember, it came up in Dunn, the largest town in the county (I refuse to call it a city) that sits astride I-95 that there should be a Liquor by the Drink referendum on the ballot.
HUGE billboards went up saying how liquor and alcohol were the devil's work and all kinds of crap, and this was the 3rd time this had happened (the referendum), but this time it managed to pass.
Now, you can order mixed drinks in many of the restaurants (but not McDonald's yet), but the fact that the people working there are still from Harnett county prohibits them from knowing very much including how to make about 99% of mixed drinks.
Arghhh....I'm just glad that I'll be in raleigh when I turn 21
~Ian
- -------------------------
What's that file that's attached you ask? Well, its my Gnu Privacy Guard (GnuPG) signature that can be used to authenticate this email. For more information, check out http://www.gnupg.org/(en)/documentation/faqs.html
On Jan 12, 2004, at 9:05 AM, zman wrote:
On Mon, 12 Jan 2004, Tom Boucher wrote:-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
I think you underestimate the forces you are going up against. We still
have dry countyies and some extremely conservative politicians catering to
the religious right. Though I have noticed things get better in the 20
years I've lived in NC. But if you feel you must, fight on. I think you
think about the fact that Jack Daniels is produced in a dry county
Tennesee up until 1995. It still has no liquor by the drink. So in the
grand scheme of things we're doing ok....
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFAArvkDaRr/N2jLBARAndcAJ9XpoHWedy+3eBN3X1hV6SGxY1/HgCgkxOt
bAXCtuI7KxCoVj4e4qCeij0=
=lDQY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Diana Duncan, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
micah, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, David R . Matusiak, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Roger Austin, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
micah, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Diana Duncan, 01/11/2004
- [internetworkers] creek boating, Scott Lundgren, 01/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.