internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/

List archive

RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues

From: "Jim Ray" <jim AT neuse.net>
To: "'Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/'" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>, <thomas AT tbeckett.com>
Cc:
Subject: RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2004 14:46:13 -0500

...and then Craig has to go blow my little old pea brain and introduce
single barrel.

-----Original Message-----
From: internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org
[mailto:internetworkers-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Diana Duncan
Sent: Sunday, January 11, 2004 2:41 PM
To: thomas AT tbeckett.com; Internetworkers:
http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
Subject: Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues

Interesting that the article did not explain the difference between
single malt and pure malt - it is not just semantic. As I understand
it, a single malt is malt whisky all from the same distillery, but
usually from different years (the age on the bottle is the youngest
whisky present in the blend). A pure malt is usually malt whiskies
from more than one distillery. A blend uses grain whisky in addition
to malt.

[internetworkers] back to important issues, Thomas Beckett, 01/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Paul Jones, 01/10/2004
  - Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Judy Hallman, 01/10/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Paul Cory, 01/10/2004
  - RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jim Ray, 01/10/2004
    - Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zzd, 01/10/2004
    - Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Thomas Beckett, 01/10/2004
      - Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/11/2004
        
        RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Diana Duncan, 01/11/2004
  - RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
    - RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues, micah, 01/11/2004
      - Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Thomas Beckett, 01/11/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, David R . Matusiak, 01/11/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
        
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/12/2004
        Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004