internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp AT pobox.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 09:44:12 -0500
On Mon, 2004-01-12 at 09:05, zman wrote:
> I think you underestimate the forces you are going up against. We still
> have dry countyies and some extremely conservative politicians catering to
> the religious right. Though I have noticed things get better in the 20
> years I've lived in NC. But if you feel you must, fight on. I think you
> think about the fact that Jack Daniels is produced in a dry county
> Tennesee up until 1995. It still has no liquor by the drink. So in the
> grand scheme of things we're doing ok....
I think it's funny that in NC, you can have dry counties but yet
incorporated cities within the counties can sell alcohol. For example,
Swain County in western NC is apparently completely dry (no alcohol
sales at all in the county), yet the full complement of beer and wine is
available in Bryson City. So the drunks just have to drive farther to
get refills -- now that's safe, isn't it?
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp AT pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues
, (continued)
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/10/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Ian Meyer, 01/11/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Ian Meyer, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Diana Duncan, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
micah, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, David R . Matusiak, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, zman, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Ian Meyer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Roger Austin, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/11/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
micah, 01/11/2004
-
RE: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Jim Ray, 01/11/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] back to important issues,
Thomas Beckett, 01/10/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.