internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?]
- From: Tanner Lovelace <lovelace AT wayfarer.org>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?]
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:37:32 -0500
Jeremy Portzer wrote:
Was he using a VoIP phone, or a traditional analog telephone that used
the UTP wiring (in which case we can't call it Ethernet)?
Neither. It's a voice over layer 2 phone. It does indeed go over ethernet,
but not at the IP level.
A VoIP phone, which I know he has but don't know if that's the one
described here, would certainly not get that kind of interference from
the contractor's Nextel phone in the ceiling. Any interference would
cause Ethernet frame errors, or TCP transmission errors, and the packets
would not be transmitted. This would be heard by the end user as
garbled words, dropped syllables, or pauses in the conversation. I
don't know how an audible hum like that could possibly be imparted onto
a digitally transmitted signal.
But, as I said, it's not a VoIP phone. It's VoL2, which might have
problems.
Regardless, I don't think that could happen if the phone was really an
Ehternet (ie, VoIP) phone. But it could if it was an analog phone,
Jeremy, you seem to think that the only type of ethernet phone it could
be is VoIP. That's obviously not the case. Because it's layer 2, I
can easily believe that some sort of interference affected the phone's
connection.
[... rest of long series of fowards, replies, etc deleted, as Jeremy
should have done... ]
Cheers,
Tanner
--
Tanner Lovelace | lovelace(at)wayfarer.org | http://wtl.wayfarer.org/
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
GPG Fingerprint = A66C 8660 924F 5F8C 71DA BDD0 CE09 4F8E DE76 39D4
GPG Key can be found at http://wtl.wayfarer.org/lovelace.gpg.asc
--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--*--
Have we sent the "Don't shoot, we're pathetic" transmission yet?
Commander John Crichton (Farscape)
-
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
, (continued)
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, zman, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Ian Meyer, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
- [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Mark Turner, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Tanner Lovelace, 01/07/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Tanner Lovelace, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Mobile Phone Safety [was Re: Why home phone service at all?], Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Re: Why home phone service at all?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- [internetworkers] Another local event, James Z. Godwin, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Maria Winslow, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Tanner Lovelace, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Tanner Lovelace, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.