internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
- From: Jeremy Portzer <jeremyp AT pobox.com>
- To: "Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/" <internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org>
- Subject: Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?
- Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2004 14:04:50 -0500
On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:04, K. Jo Garner wrote:
> On Wed, 7 Jan 2004, Jeremy Portzer wrote:
> ->If you already have broadband Internet, and a cell phone, why have a
> ->home phone at all? I've been without a home phone for over a year now
>
> Because cell phones are nothing more than glorified CB radios.
>
Sorry for coming in late on this, but while you may be correct depending
on your definition of "glorified," I don't see how this affects my
argument. A telephone is a glorified telegraph. A telegraph is a
glorified Pony Express. A Pony Express is a glorified version of
walking the message there yourself. As we "glorify" technology by
making it MUCH better in many ways, our lifesytle improves. Are you
that much of a reactionary that you can't stand new technology?
Now, I agree there are problems with cell phones, the biggest one being
the issues of etiquette. A few months ago not only did a cell phone
ring at a movie I was seeing, but the person answered it and carried on
a long conversation, at full volume, despite being shushed by her
neighbors. It was not a fun experience, and I know this wasn't an
isolated incident. People certainly need to learn when to silence or
turn off their cell phones! I usually leave mine in the car whenever
going to a restaurant, movie, etc, so it doesn't interrupt, and I wish
everyone else would do the same.
--Jeremy
--
/---------------------------------------------------------------------\
| Jeremy Portzer jeremyp AT pobox.com trilug.org/~jeremy |
| GPG Fingerprint: 712D 77C7 AB2D 2130 989F E135 6F9F F7BC CC1A 7B92 |
\---------------------------------------------------------------------/
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-
Re: [internetworkers] Another local event
, (continued)
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Tanner Lovelace, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- RE: [internetworkers] Another local event, Michael D. Thomas, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, Sil Greene, 01/12/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] Another local event, David R . Matusiak, 01/13/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Tom Boucher, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Tom Boucher, 01/07/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW PhoneService?, SJM, 01/08/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW PhoneService?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Jeremy Portzer, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, David R . Matusiak, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Tom Boucher, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, Thomas Beckett, 01/12/2004
- Re: Why home phone service at all? RE: [internetworkers] TW Phone Service?, K. Jo Garner, 01/12/2004
-
Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com,
Sil Greene, 01/06/2004
- Re: [internetworkers] nc.rr.com, Roger Austin, 01/06/2004
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.