internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Internetworkers: http://www.ibiblio.org/internetworkers/
List archive
- From: Rachel Cox <rachel AT hesketh.com>
- To: internetworkers AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest
- Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2002 12:53:39 -0400
At 12:46 PM 10/17/2002 -0400, Josef Komenda wrote:
>
>I think Dave just doesn't like people named Chris who testify on behalf of
>their faith, be it in Christianity or Microsoft.
Y'know, I went back and read through all of Chris' posts that I have on the list (and I, sadly, never delete anything), and didn't find him really remarking on religion at all, at least until Dave started attacking him for being Christian - a fact he seems to have picked up from a sig Chris was using on another list, is that right? So I'm really puzzled by (though not actually curious about) the animosity Dave seems to hold towards Chris. Unless he thinks it's justifiable to hate an entire group - particulary one as varied and wide-ranging as Christians - because of the actions of some of them.
If that's justifiable, then ... well, no, I think I'll still choose not to hate Libertarians, Republicans, Democrats (of which I'm one), Christians (again, raising a hand and waving), Muslims, Whites, Men, Women, Children, Dogs, Cats, Elephants.... you get my point.
Huh.
There's naught so strange as folk.
Cheers, y'all!
-Rachel
_____________________________________________________________________
Rachel Cox | Web Developer | 919.834.2552 x16 | hesketh.com/inc
Image is only the beginning. Knowledge is profitable.
http://www.hesketh.com/proof/white_papers/
-
[internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
Diana Duncan, 10/16/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest, Josep L. Guallar-Esteve, 10/16/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
H. Wade Minter, 10/16/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/16/2002
- RE: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest, Gina Norman, 10/16/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
David R. Matusiak, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest,
David R. Matusiak, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Josef Komenda, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Rachel Cox, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, David R. Matusiak, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Maria Winslow, 10/17/2002
- [internetworkers] followup on Sean Haugh, Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest,
David R. Matusiak, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Tanner Lovelace, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Tanner Lovelace, 10/17/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Michael D. Thomas, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/17/2002
-
Re: [internetworkers] Our Senatorial contest,
Chris Hedemark, 10/16/2002
- Re: [internetworkers] Our Unsatisfactory contest, Steven Champeon, 10/17/2002
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.