Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff interview, immeninent dem

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Leslie <cayadopi AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff interview, immeninent dem
  • Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:25:32 -0800 (PST)

A friend of mine in N. FL, a former trucker many many years ago, called me
last month.  Said that he had received 2 phone calls from 2 different people
trying to give him trucks, just take over payments..... They will be real
cheap in a few years..... for those foolish enough to buy.  But then oil
supply destruction comes into play.
 
Yes, rail should be used more.  I don't know if Buffet is super smart or
not.... but a couple years ago he did start buying up a few railroads.  Maybe
he is anticipating decreased rail use down the road.
 
Ah, true on diesel delivered to farms, no road tax on that one.  My error. 
Only tax on farm vehicles filled up at the local gas stations.
 
 
I would definitely have concerns about all kinds of increasing taxes under a
hyperinflation scenario.  I would not trust the government to keep things as
they have been when government becomes desperate.
 


--- On Sun, 1/11/09, Lynda <lurine AT com-pair.net> wrote:

From: Lynda <lurine AT com-pair.net>
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff
interview,immeninent dem
To: cayadopi AT yahoo.com, homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Date: Sunday, January 11, 2009, 2:32 PM

Ah, Leslie, farmers don't pay tax on diesel for tractors. Increasing taxes
won't hurt them in the least.

And that would be my point about the trucking industry which is a major waste
of fuel. If you look around the countryside you'll see old off-loading
platforms all over the place on the rail lines. They are all now defunct
because of the gas hungry trucking industry. The day of the trucker is fast
approaching a realistic demise. Trucks should be used for short haul only!

Lynda



>From lurine AT com-pair.net Sun Jan 11 15:28:09 2009
Return-Path: <lurine AT com-pair.net>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
id 58E454C022; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:28:06 -0500 (EST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=STOX_REPLY_TYPE
autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from mail.com-pair.net (mail.com-pair.net [208.74.104.248])
by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B64574C04E
for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:26:30 -0500
(EST)
Received: from Moon (dhcp-nat.com-pair.net [208.74.107.254]) by
mail.com-pair.net
(Rockliffe SMTPRA 8.0.4) with ESMTP id
<B0012020701 AT mail.com-pair.net>;
Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:26:29 -0800
Message-ID: <01f201c9742a$e4cc4310$5e03fe0a@Moon>
From: "Lynda" <lurine AT com-pair.net>
To: <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>, <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <531221.69447.qm AT web53912.mail.re2.yahoo.com>
Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:22:57 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Fear & Loathing , new Peter Schiff interview,
immeninent demi
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
<mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 11 Jan 2009 20:28:09 -0000

Bob, you are approaching this from the wrong end. There is no reason for
the train to cost that much to build. Nor is there any reason for it to
cost that much to run. Can we spell
over-priced-politically-motivated-Davis-Bacon-union-run?

When we talk about common sense, then it is time to talk about stopping the
other forms of welfare. The $700 screw drivers and the $35/hr goldbrick
job.

Lynda
----- Original Message -----
From: "bobf" <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>


> Lynn, I think our train cost (just direct costs)about 10 million dollars
> per mile. And, on top of that, the passenger fares will be 'heavily'
> subsidized. Don't get me wrong. The train is good for 'me'. These type
> economic policies are not good for the nation, though..........





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page