Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

homestead - Re: [Homestead] Upcoming - under Dem/Obama reign - wsj

homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Homestead mailing list

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: bob ford <bobford79 AT yahoo.com>
  • To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [Homestead] Upcoming - under Dem/Obama reign - wsj
  • Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2008 09:32:02 -0700 (PDT)

This prohibited all of the mess, if we had just followed what the
Constitution required:

(Tenth Amendment) –

"The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor
prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or
to the people. "

-------------------------------------------------------------------------


--- On Tue, 10/28/08, DSanner106 AT aol.com <DSanner106 AT aol.com> wrote:

> From: DSanner106 AT aol.com <DSanner106 AT aol.com>
> Subject: Re: [Homestead] Upcoming - under Dem/Obama reign - wsj
> To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
> Date: Tuesday, October 28, 2008, 10:18 AM
> That would probably be a better focus, asking if you like
> paying taxes is
> like asking if you like
> getting a root canal, or would you like a poke in the eye
> with a sharp
> stick. The answer is obvious
> and nearly universal. It is a politicians trick to make you
> think they are
> like you, by stating support
> for the obvious.
>
> Personally, I think we either really fight drugs, or
> legalize them and take
> away the criminal elements profit
> motive. If we do that, we need to require more personal
> responsibility. If
> one commits a crime, the punishment is increased for having
> a gun, whether it
> was used or not. If one commits a traffic violation, it is
> dramatically more
> severe if drunk. If one commits a crime on drugs, rather
> than be a mitigating
> circumstance it should also increase the punishment. That
> would encourage
> personal responsibility for ones actions and help limit
> some of the negatives
> against legalizing drugs.
> The military will be cut again as soon as the war is over,
> but can never be
> eliminated. As far as picking
> one to fund more than the others, that should happen every
> year, it should
> be need based. We cannot just
> shut down the Navy, but they don't need the same amount
> each year.
> The federal govt. should NEVER build hometown museums, and
> should build
> bridges on highway systems that benefit all people, but not
> local bridges. I
> could support a federal loan program to states and
> localities that need such
> things, but that is it.
>
> Drew
>
>
> In a message dated 10/28/2008 11:39:09 A.M. Eastern
> Daylight Time,
> don.bowen AT earthlink.net writes:
>
> What we should be doing instead is questioning how the
> money is being spent.
> Do we really need to spend all that money on fighting the
> drug war against
> Marijuana? Do we really need to spend the exact same
> amount on all three
> military services? Do we need to spend federal money for
> a hometown museum,
> or a bridge that benefits only a few campaign donors? The
> list goes on but
> that is much harder than saying "cut taxes."
>
> We all have different ideas on what the Government should
> provide but we all
> have similar biases against paying taxes.
>
> **************Play online games for FREE at Games.com! All
> of your favorites,
> no registration required and great graphics – check it
> out!
> (http://pr.atwola.com/promoclk/100000075x1211202682x1200689022/aol?redir=
> http://www.games.com?ncid=emlcntusgame00000001)
> _______________________________________________
> Homestead list and subscription:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead
> Change your homestead list member options:
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/options/homestead/bobford79%40yahoo.com
> View the archives at:
> https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page