Homestead mailing list

[Akka Homestead <akkabhomestead AT yahoo.com>]

bob ford wrote:
> Most of this crap started with Clinton, and I still don't see how a
> lot of it is constitutional. 

I know.  That was my first thought when I first heard all of this back in the 
mid 90's.  How can this be?  I was reminded of it all when William so timely 
posted his accusation of Bush.  I did not directly point the finger to 
Clinton in that other post, but I hoped people would pick up on the date of 
PDD-67.  Clinton seemed to take all of the orders for the past 40 years and 
combine them, then Bush updated the EO to include Homeland Security.  It is 
scary stuff.  But Bush doesn't have the intelligence to mastermind anything 
this comprehensive.  This has NWO/Illumati fingerprints all over it.  Before 
you can dominate the world, you must unify it.  Step one is regional, step 
two is continental, step three is hemispherical, and, if you are controlling 
the  world economy at the same time, you basically have all the strings.

> 
> Starting in 18 days every passport will have a RFID chip.! ! !   You
> used to be able to drive to Mexico, from here, and spend the weekend
> at Rocky Point with nothing but a drivers license, now your every
> movement can be tracked instantaneously, and will be recorded.  This
> is a big deal, but no one is talking about this.

It is just the tip of the iceberg, as you know.
> 
> Starting this week, FBI agents, who don't have any more education or
> make any more money than some on this list, can authorize themselves
> to surveil you, on a good hunch.

It is human nature.  Hunch = profiling

In my neck of the woods, some Hispanics are being pulled over not for drugs 
or immigration violations, no, they just happened to drive by or photograph 
the wrong place, like an airport or a power plant.  Some Hispanics resemble 
Arabs from a distance, they say.  
Just an excuse, ASAIAC.



> 
> These things are frightening to me.  But no one else seems to care.

I care, but people look at you funny if you talk about it.  It very often 
seems odd to me that people just refuse to see it...they refuse to believe it 
could happen or that it could happen to them.(rights being violated, etc)  
They refuse to grasp the seriousness of something like your local EMC turning 
over power use records to law enforcement.




>From lurine AT softcom.net  Sun Sep 14 19:10:25 2008
Return-Path: <lurine AT softcom.net>
X-Original-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Delivered-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
Received: by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix, from userid 3002)
        id 4A4A24C026; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:10:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.3 (2007-08-08) on malecky
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0.0 required=5.0 tests=STOX_REPLY_TYPE
        autolearn=disabled version=3.2.3
Received: from inoculator.softcom.net (inoculator.softcom.net [207.13.104.11])
        by lists.ibiblio.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97C7A4C01F
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 19:10:24 -0400 
(EDT)
Received: from Moon (67-150-143-171.stkn.mdsg-pacwest.com [67.150.143.171])
        by inoculator.softcom.net (8.13.6/8.12.11) with SMTP id m8EN9hVR006931
        for <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>; Sun, 14 Sep 2008 16:09:45 -0700
Message-ID: <006901c916c7$5b8a67f0$ab8f9643@Moon>
From: "Lynda" <lurine AT softcom.net>
To: <homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
References: <ce2.39968893.35fee6ca AT wmconnect.com>
Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 15:57:43 -0800
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
        reply-type=original
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2900.3138
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2900.3350
X-SOFTCOM-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-SOFTCOM-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-From: lurine AT softcom.net
Subject: Re: [Homestead] Republicans appear to be yesterday
X-BeenThere: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org
List-Id: <homestead.lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.ibiblio.org/sympa/arc/homestead>
List-Post: <mailto:homestead AT lists.ibiblio.org>
List-Help: <mailto:sympa AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=HELP>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/homestead>,
        <mailto:homestead-request AT lists.ibiblio.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 23:10:25 -0000

I really have to laugh when dyed in the wool Dems and the sheople get all
bugged eyed over Carl Rove.  That evil, evil, EVIL little man and all those
EVIL things he's done.

HELLO, they need to wake up and smell the sulfur.  David Axelrod makes Rove
look like Shirley Temple!  Axelrod has been playing the American public like
a fine tuned violin!

Let's look at some of the Axelrodisms that the sheople are swallowing:

1.  "Obama is about change."  Nope, he's voted in lockstep with most
everything that's been going on that is negative for the average American
citizen.  The latest being FISA.

2.  "Obama isn't taking any money from lobbyists."  When ol' Teflon goes to
file his champaign tax forms there are going to be HUNDREDS of thousands of
dollars of "in kind" and it is all from lobbyists.

3.  "Obama voted against the war."  Teflon wasn't in Congress and I've
quoted his words here enough that folks *should* know that he said he wasn't
any different than Bush when it came to the war AND he didn't know how he
would have voted.

And then there were the attacks against Clinton and calling him a racist.
That was an Axelrod with Jessie Jackson's son being the mouth piece.

The list is long and these barely scrape the surface.  Everyone is so busy
enjoying the party and the excitement that they get to be a part of that
they aren't looking at the cold hard facts.

And all the hysteria about McNasty and Roe v. Wade is another one that would
be just plain hysterical if it wasn't so scarey that folks can't see what's
right in front of them.  McNasty has always been pro-choice.  He's *now*
pro-life to win an election.  When being pro-life didn't bring all the good
little "base" back into the Republican camp, he got a "shiney thing" to
distract AND passify them.

~~sigh~~  I just don't think there's any hope for the great unwashed masses.
I'm just gonna sit up here on my hill and keep on keeping on with eating
biscuits and homemade jam <g>  And, now that the blooming smoke is gone,
I'll have a bunch of zucchini pickles (bread & butter, dill and kosher) to
go along with the jam.  And enough shredded zucchini in the freezer to make
muffins and bread til the cows come home!  Hope y'all have your pantry as
well stocked!

Lynda
----- Original Message -----
From: <Clansgian AT wmconnect.com>
>
> So I've heard.  Repeatedly.  Under the principle, I suppose, that if we
> just
> keep repeating something it will, if not take on an air of truth, it will
> at
> least cease to be questioned.
>
> McCain is joined at the hip with Bush and the Oil Boyz.
>
> Yet when I look for concrete evidence of this, I have a bit of trouble
> confirming it.
>
> The figure is bandied about that McCain "voted with" Bush 90% of the time.
> I'm not sure how you determine what "voting with" is, but on the bills
> that
> Bush endorsed, it turns out McCain voted about 45% of the time on the
> bills Bush
> is stated as favoring and Obama voted about 40% of the time (if you simply
> discount the times either failed to vote altogether).
>
> That glued at the hip connection isn't t here.
>
> There are plenty of fine reasons for not voting for McCain, but the 'four
> more years' is basically a fabrication.  An effective one, one that is
> often
> repeated and much accepted, but a fabrication none the less.   </HTML>