Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

ch-scene - Re: Off topic talk of..How'd my man do?

ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: RTP-area local music and culture

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: rws6 <rws6 AT duke.edu>
  • To: RTP-area local music and culture <ch-scene AT lists.ibiblio.org>
  • Subject: Re: Off topic talk of..How'd my man do?
  • Date: Fri, 8 Oct 2004 10:07:24 -0400


you know, if you'd kept your guns in the trunk you'd have avoided this
hassle...


Quoting rcu AT duke.edu:

> > There's still much open debate on if across the board roadblocks are legal
> > or not
>
> "General warrants, whereby an officer or other person may be commanded
> to search suspected places WITHOUT EVIDENCE OF THE ACT COMMITTED, or to
> seize any person or persons NOT NAMED, whose offense is not
> PARTICULARLY DESCRIBED and SUPPORTED BY EVIDENCE, are DANGEROUS TO LIBERTY
> and SHALL NOT BE GRANTED." (N.C. Const. I.20)
>
> > [M]aybe next time you shouldn't carry a concealed fiream when you don't
> > have a CCW.
>
> Maybe next time I should try to kill my kidnappers instead of trusting them
> to give me an impartial hearing.
>
> > That's a law that they're perfectly correct in chucking you in the
> > back of a cop car for violating
>
> They were perfectly incorrect to be stopping or searching me in the
> first place. If I'd done the same to them they'd've correctly charged me
> with multiple felonies. Where did equality of rights go?
>
> > and it's also a law that the majority of
> > the population feels is perfectly reasonable.
>
> Care to prove that by getting all the votes counted? Whole unrepealed
> clauses of our state and federal Constitutions explicitly support my right
> to possess my own property. The property category of weaponry is
> made particular mention of. The Libertarian Party didn't ordain that. We
> the People did.
>
> > As a matter of fact, it
> > makes the roadblock law *much less likely* to be overturned "See! We
> found
> > a crazed, gun-toting libertarian! We _need_ this law!". Thanks a lot.
>
> Your agents attacked me for acting within my rights. Thank yourself;
> they're
> your rights too.
>
> > (side note: Yes, you have a right to keep and bear arms, but keep your
> > paperwork up to date.
>
> The Constitution is my paperwork. Obey it or amend it, don't suspend it.
>
> > Do you also not get your car inspected because you
> > refuse to recognize the authority of the local Jiffy Lube?)
>
> No but they refused to give me the sticker for it because I couldn't keep
> the registration up to date, because the DMV said I owed a tax, but I
> didn't, because I was not given an equal counted vote in the election of
> those who set the tax.
>
> That was then. I have not been able to keep a good car maintenance
> budget going since the trial knocked me for such a loop. I am pretty
> confined to bicycling now. Or will you send gunmen to stop me from doing
> that too?
>
> In simplest terms I would like to understand why you think I should have
> been harmed (15-20 court calls of time-wasting spread out over two
> years before a jury was empaneled; $1500 fine; permanent loss of two
> guns; loss of right to possess weapons for a year) when I had caused no
> harm myself.
>
> > Note, too, while your entry into the car may have been somewhat less
> > dignified than a person of your political stature is used to
>
> :)
>
> >, you were not treated to a baton hairstyling, broken thumbs, or death.
>
> A threat of death started the whole incident. Your armed goon Harry
> Bennett stopped me out of the blue in the middle of Main Street in the
> middle of the night and ordered me to
> submit to a search for no reason. If I did that to you you would call
> it kidnapping. But when it's done to me I should consider it a favor
> because y'all didn't just shoot me right when I first "resisted arrest"
> by asserting my right not to be interrogated?
> -- ch-scene: the list that mirrors alt.music.chapel-hill --
> http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/ch-scene
>







Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page