b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum
List archive
- From: Kevin Riley <klriley AT alphalink.com.au>
- To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
- Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key
- Date: Wed, 03 Nov 2010 13:58:34 +1100
Are you sure the Hebrew speaker 'thinks' alternative meanings? I know as an English speaker that alternative meanings that don't fit the contexts don't get consciously thought of.
On 3/11/2010 1:39 PM, fred burlingame wrote:
Paul:
I hear what you both say, but it appears to me, that a big difference exists
between the hebrew and its english translation.
a. When the consumer of the hebrew language hears the word "ha-yil" he
thinks "army" or "tangible property" as potential meanings of "ha-yil" (in
the context of numbers 31:9,14).
b. When the consumer of the english language hears the word "army" he
doesn't think "tangible property" as a potential meaning of "army" or vice
versa (in the context of these two verses).
Biblical hebrew language does not surpass or defer to modern english
language. But the two languages simply become susceptible of but approximate
translation between the two.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Paul Zellmer<pzellmer AT sc.rr.com> wrote:
Fred,_______________________________________________
To echo Dr. Vance's note, had you looked up the TWOT article to which I
referred you, you would have found exactly this explanation. The word also
has a number of other idiomatic usages, all tied together with the root
concept of power.
Paul Zellmer
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:
b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of Donald Vance
Sent: Tuesday, November 02, 2010 4:31 PM
To: fred burlingame
Cc: B-Hebrew
Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key
Your premise is mistaken. The meanings ARE related. Hayil has the basic
meaning of "power" in Classical Hebrew. It can be power that derives from
having an army or the power that derives from having wealth, or the power
that derives from strength of character.
Sent from my iPhone
Donald R. Vance
Professor of Biblical Languages and Literature
Oral Roberts University
donaldrvance AT mac.com
On Nov 2, 2010, at 2:22 PM, fred burlingame<tensorpath AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Matt:as
Thanks for your comments.
I accept the mainstream translations (nkjv, niv, nasb) of numbers 31:9,14
the best possible english translations. I probably would also accept asperson
excellent, any english translation that you or any other reasonable
might propose. It doesn't matter which translation we choose. Why?חיל
Because the english translation must select one english word for usage in
one verse ("goods") and another unrelated and disconnected english word
("army") in the other verse.
The hebrew language original however, employs the identical hebrew word
in both locations. And this hebrew noun obviously, closely resemblesof
and relates to its parent hebrew verb חיל , meaning to twist or dance.
The consumer of the hebrew text twice experiences, three related meanings
one hebrew word חיל . The consumer of the hebrew text further observes athe
connexity between verses 9 and 14, due to repetitive usage of the word.
The consumer of the english text however, sees only independence, where
hebrew reader instead observes relationship and pregnancy of meaning.referring
The chronic repetition of this circumstance across the masoretic text and
with other hebrew words, effectively locks the text to translation. Yes,
translation occurs frequently from the hebrew. But the hebrew original
resembles other language translation only as apples mirror oranges.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Tue, Nov 2, 2010 at 9:15 AM, pastormattfbcrankin<
pastormattfbcrankin AT gmail.com> wrote:
Hello Fred,
What exactly is the "richness of these connections" that you are
follow,to here? How is it that the Hebrew reader has a completely different
understanding that the English or Greek reader? I'm afraid I don't
thatplease enlighten me. Futhermore, how would you translate these verses
meanwould differ so greatly from how it is currently translated?
My Hebrew prof in college once said, "Every translation is a betrayal of
the text." This is true to a degree, but that being said it doesn't
Wethat the language is locked i.e. indecipherable into another language.
losewill lose certain nuances, but I suspect you are trying to say that we
andfar more than that.
Warmest Regards,
-Matt Williams
On Nov 1, 2010, at 9:28 PM, fred burlingame wrote:
Hello Paul:army;
I agree with your comments.
I would observe however, that in this particular case, we have:
a. a parent hebrew verb with a meaning to bore or pierce;
b. a child hebrew noun with two alternate meanings of wealth/goods and
c. and such two noun definitions used in two verses of close physical
englishsubject matter proximity.the
The richness of these connections gives the hebrew reading consumer of
verses an entirely different understanding, than the disconnected
wrote:words reveal to the english reading consumer.
Much of the hebrew meaning survives translation, not. Hence, the hebrew
language appears locked to english or greek or any other language
translation.
regards,
fred burlingame
On Mon, Nov 1, 2010 at 8:04 PM, Paul Zellmer<pzellmer AT sc.rr.com>
articleFred,
The Theological Wordbook of the Old Testament (TWOT) has a good
usedBasically,explaining the relationships of the various usages of the word.
theboth of the cases here would be considered idiomatic in the field of
translation. When translating idioms, one needs to almost always find
underlying meaning behind the idiom as opposed to the actual words
proximity.and
oftranslate that concept. This is because a direct, literal translation
whenthe idiom from one language to another yields either zero meaning or
incorrect meaning.
This is not just true in translating Hebrew to English--it is the case
languagesyou go from any language to another. It is especially true if the
are not closely related.
Paul Zellmer
-----Original Message-----
From: b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org [mailto:
b-hebrew-bounces AT lists.ibiblio.org] On Behalf Of fred burlingame
Sent: Sunday, October 31, 2010 5:06 PM
To: B-Hebrew
Subject: [b-hebrew] lock without a key
Hello all:
a little arithmetic.
1 = 2; or 2 = 2
Biblical hebrew ("BH") language enjoys a unique characteristic. The
language
frequently employs a single word, twice or more, in physical
loseThe single word however, denotes a different meaning in each location.
Translations capture the different meanings of the single word, but
thethe
connexity of the verses, and the depth of the single hebrew word in
______________________________________________________________________________________________בזזוprocess. Witness: חיל :
וישבו בני ישראל נשי מדין ואת טפם ואת כל בהמתם ואת כל מקנהם ואת כל חילם
numbers 31:9_______________________________________________
ויקצף משה על פקודי החיל שרי האלפים ושרי המאות הבאים מצבא המלחמה
numbers 31:14
And so, the question arises. Does BH contained a lock that prevents
translation?
regards,
fred burlingame
_______________________________________________
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
b-hebrew mailing list
b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
http://lists.ibiblio.org/mailman/listinfo/b-hebrew
-
Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key
, (continued)
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Isaac Fried, 11/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, fred burlingame, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Isaac Fried, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Arnaud Fournet, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Isaac Fried, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Arnaud Fournet, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, fred burlingame, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Isaac Fried, 11/03/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, fred burlingame, 11/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Kevin Riley, 11/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, fred burlingame, 11/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, Yigal Levin, 11/02/2010
- Re: [b-hebrew] lock without a key, fred burlingame, 11/03/2010
Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.