Skip to Content.
Sympa Menu

b-hebrew - Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Uncancellable meaning and Hebrew verbs

b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org

Subject: Biblical Hebrew Forum

List archive

Chronological Thread  
  • From: Rolf Furuli <furuli AT online.no>
  • To: b-hebrew AT lists.ibiblio.org
  • Subject: Re: [b-hebrew] b-hebrew Uncancellable meaning and Hebrew verbs
  • Date: Wed, 24 Jun 2009 10:05:35 +0200

Dear Bryant,

I am not sure what you are asking for. In English we have the participle that can describe actions, as the verb does. The point I tried to convey was that in English the participle has no intrinsic tense, but still it can have past, present, and future reference. This shows there can be a difference between tense and temporal reference, We can do the same with English present. I take the example from Broman Olsen who was a native speaker and a linguist. On the basis of 1)-4) Broman Olsen concludes that English present is not a tense. And on the basis of 5) -7) she concludes that English simple past is past tense.

1) So Paul works all yesterday to finish. (Past)

2) Paul works from now until 4. (present)

3) Paul works tomorrow. (future)

4) Paul works (Omni-temporal)

5) Matt ran yesterday.

6) #Matt ran as I am speaking.

7) #Matt ran tomorrow.

Please help me understand what you are asking for.


Best regards.

Rolf Furuli
University of Oslo



Dear Rolf,

[Rolf Said]
Here I will just say that the comments above are so silly that I am
completely breathless.
No linguist will deny that there is a difference between past
reference and past tense. The English participle has present
reference in 1), past reference in 2), and future reference in 3).
But the past reference in 2) does not indicate that the participle
expresses past tense; it is not a tense.


1) Right now Rita is walking.

2) Yesterday Rita was walking.

3) Tomorrow Rita will be walking.

[Bryant]
"Walking" is an English participle. All you have done is add a participle with a
verb of "to be" (walking + to be) with a time reference noun. The example number
2 has "yesterday + was (to be verb)" qualifying as to when in the past that the
action of the subject occured. Without the qualifying time reference noun all
one would know is that "Rita was walking."

So please indicate from BH examples in the Tanach the following verbs:

Bara'
Yatsar
Asah'
Hayah
Davar

Also please indicate the source as narrative, poetry, prophetic, etc., genre.

If what you say is correct, then would it apply in all of the different genres
found in the Tanach? If not, why?

Rev. Bryant J. Williams III





Archive powered by MHonArc 2.6.24.

Top of Page